Replies

Wow, all the way up to 84mg. That's not including the one that did 168mg with a result of -152% improvement (ventilator) Guess that was way too late so they figured they'd give a massive dose.

Treatment time	Number of studies reporting positive effects	Total number of studies	Percentage of studies reporting positive effects	Probability of an equal or greater percentage of positive results from an ineffective treatment	Random effects meta-analysis results
Early treatment	24	27	88.9%	1 in 41 thousand	72% improvement RR 0.28 [0.18‑0.45] p < 0.0001
Late treatment	20	22	90.9%	1 in 17 thousand	40% improvement RR 0.60 [0.48‑0.76] p < 0.0001
Prophylaxis	14	14	100%	1 in 16 thousand	86% improvement RR 0.14 [0.08‑0.25] p < 0.0001
All studies	58	63	92.1%	1 in 1 trillion	68% improvement RR 0.32 [0.25‑0.40] p < 0.0001

Looks like prophylaxis is the way to go. 86% compared to 72% for early treatment. Late treatment = hospital/bad.

I'm going to have to do some reading there, check out some studies. Brett Weintein show I saw said Ivermectin is oil soluble and also said take it with food due to that.

BTW one of someone else's links in this thread had drug interactions which is a good thing to know

Another one for the “list”

Ivermectin for Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis to Inform Clinical Guidelines

American Journal of Therapeutics: July/August 2021 - Volume 28 - Issue 4 - p e434-e460
doi: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000001402

https://journals.lww.com/americantherapeutics/fulltext/2021/08000/ivermectin_for_prevention_and_treatment_of.7.aspx