Replies

:: If it doesn’t work, you’ll be the first to know, okay. ::
Well, \I\ must oppose this a “bovine scatology” (no personal slight intended...)

Every Flu Season (caps intended) we hear about the vaxx needed to stave-off the _likely_ flu bug that is coming.
The CDC reports that a certain variation is MOST likely to infect the population and a vaxx is developed (INF-A or INF-B) to force (herd-) immunity and minimize deaths (not infection...) moving forward.
We (not me) take these vaxx \pre-preemptively\.

We (the collective) have seen that, with COVID-19, such premonition was either unforeseen, ignored or...?

If it is a “virus’, why doesn’t act like a virus?
2x vaxx?
Boosters?
Where do \We The People\ ask, “Give us a definitive answer and quit dancing around pseudo-science!”
until then, we are the whims of government...not our health-givers.

I know this is still in the back of everyone's mind because the shills are trying to capitalize on it. And that is why I bring it up again. Breaking it down, there is a lot of "buts" in that. and some phrases that are odd.

when you see it in writing, it is a clearer picture of something else:

"But you got to do what you have to do..., but I recommend, take the vaccines. I did it. It’s good. Take the vaccines, but you got… No, that’s okay. That’s all right. You got your freedoms. But I happened to take the vaccine. If it doesn’t work, you’ll be the first to know, okay. I’ll call up Alabama and say, “Hey, you know what?” But it is working. But you do have your freedoms. You have to keep, you have to maintain that. "

That last part is a call to action of sorts. A command. It is a "hey i've got to say this right now, but you know what to do" - resist!