Posted on 08/17/2021 11:11:35 AM PDT by Stravinsky
As the old joke goes:
I want to die peacefully like my grandfather did, not screaming like the passengers in his car.
Was just there this morning...
My Oncologist did the same just 12 days ago. He was abrasive, and let it control his work quality for sure. He made mistakes relaying results of my bone scans, misidentifying places, bones and treatments. First words out of his mask when he came to the exam room were “WHERE IS YOUR MASK. PUT IT ON”. Followed by “If you don’t get vaccinated you will die of Covid not Cancer” Then went on his propaganda spiel that sounded just like “The Fauch”. I could have destroyed every assertion, but instead smirked and shook my head. You see, I had Covid, as everyone in my household did. We survived then, and I am about as immune as I can get. No thanks to the clot-shot is what I wanted to say, but he is important in my life. What an Alpha-Hole.
The doctor is blackmailing his patients, extortion. Take a medical procedure I demand or else I will refuse my medical services which may lead to your death.
If he isn’t prescribing ivermectin then he isn’t treating them anyway. If he is treating with ivermectin, they won’t die whether they were vaccinated or not.
Good luck. I think this guy is just getting out in front of what is coming.
As with any profession, some are brighter than others.
Why on earth would you go to a doctor like that?
Looks like COVID would be hard on his vaccinated self, hope he’s busy dieting...
The state medical board should pull his license, whether they will is an open question.
Most important: It does not kill the virus!!!!! It enables ADE. Ivermectin and HCQ protocols kill the virus and enable creation of anti-bodies.
Another doctor who has replaced his Hippocratic Oath with the Hypocritical Oath.
You beat me to it!
GMTA
“The doctor is blackmailing his patients, extortion. Take a medical procedure I demand or else I will refuse my medical services which may lead to your death”.
Winning post of this thread. You nailed it exactly!
It amazes me so.many so-called conservatives get all bent out of shape when private property be it physical or in this case intellectual property rights doesn’t fit their narrow political views. This doctor is a private doctor he has the sovereign right to refuse service to ANYONE for any reason he chooses as long as it don’t violate the blatantly unconstitutional title IV act butbl that’s another argument entirely. For now this private citizen has the right to pick and choose who he renders his intellectual property too. Seems so called conservatives get all big govt fascists when they don’t get their way. The market will decide if he chooses poorly to alienate 40% of his potential monetary stream.
“I think this guy is just getting out in front of what is coming”.
I agree. And he’s not alone.
The mark of the beast has arrived...
Can you find replace this doctor?
I feel badly for you and send best wishes.
So because a person exercises their right of free association and intellectual property rights you want to go all big govt fascist and use lawfare to force a private citizen to render their labors and intellectual property against their will. In the 1800 that was known as slavery. People have the right to not preform labor for someone for any reason of their choosing that’s a God given right. Don’t like that this doctor is not an antivaxer move along to one that is then don’t be spoiled children running to mommy to force the other to play with you against thier will.
As to the legal aspects good luck with a suit only civil rights act or title IV protected attributes would be actionable via litigation. Health status is found in neither statue and is not a protected class nor attribute. Yes even HIV is not protected the sexual orientation of the person is though.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.