Have you read the world wide literature. Metanalysis does not bear this out. I know you are hopeful for this result, but I sense some selection bias.
Incidentally, this triple therapy referred to is NOT Ivermectin triple therapy — this is the professor who came up with the medicinal cure for Peptic Ulcer disease understanding that H. Pylori was the cause of Ulcer, not acid, and that is the triple therapy that is referred to — it is concerning when people state things with little knowledge of what is actually being talked about — I am not stating you would not know, but you posted something from a different poster that has some error in it.
I noted earlier that the Cochrane's study itself said most of the studies it relied on were not good quality.
Low number of participants, what have you.
But the "traditional" medical community has had issues with flexibility of thought, going back to Galen. Or Semmelweis.
It just gets worse when you're talking about the CDC/FDA and treatments that aren't the favorites of Big Pharma. You did read the article I sent you from STAT written about Moderna, in 2016, right?
But there needs to be pushback against some of the trolls here and elsewhere who derisively call Ivermectin "a quack remedy" or "horse paste" given that the discoverer of Ivermectin got the 2015 Nobel Prize in medicine for it.
I think the idea in the article, is that the guy already had success in being iconoclastic, *and right*, so don't blow him off immediately.