Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: greeneyes

Thanks for posting that link.

Have been sharing with ‘vax’d friends/family, who’ve had these shots and have now come down with china flu, or are experiencing other adverse effects and/or remorse.

I saved as pdf, and printed, all of his protocols out, the other day.


317 posted on 08/15/2021 11:21:15 AM PDT by Jane Long (America, Bless God....blessed be the Nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies ]


To: Jane Long

I had not seen his site before. I’m gonna be busy there for a while.


322 posted on 08/15/2021 11:28:03 AM PDT by greeneyes ( Moderation In Pursuit of Justice is NO Virtue--LET FREEDOM RING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies ]

To: Jane Long

Have been sharing with ‘vax’d friends/family, who’ve had these shots and have now come down with china flu, or are experiencing other adverse effects and/or remorse.
_________________________________________________________

I went looking for that same information and found this nugget about the anthrax attack that got by me in the past. Maybe many of you here already knew this? (Typos/errors included as written in the article.)

“The author ... and others have presented evidence supporting a bioweapon etiology for the outbreak of COVID-19. There is concern that that some of the perpetrators are high up in the US government. This is based on the fact that the anthrax attack against the USA in 2001 was found to have originated at the US military bioweapon base, Fort Detrick, and not from Muslim extremists as the anthrax laden letters claimed. After the origins of the attack became known the FBI investigation was shut down against the advice of the FBI agent running the investigation, Richard Lee Lambert. Lambert went on to file an Qui Tam case against the US government which described his superiors’ effort to hinder the investigation of the anthrax attack and to prematurely close the case.

Prior to the release of the anthrax laden envelopes in 2001, Congressman Dan Burton held a hearing in 1999 questioning why there was such a big effort to immunize troops against anthrax. Certain members of Congress insisted an anthrax attack against America was imminent and would come from enemies overseas. These Congressmen were correct and an attack did come 2 years later, but it was an false flag attack originating from the US army’s bioweapon facility at Fort Detrick.

Retrospectively it does look highly suspicious that these Congressmen were so confident an attack was coming since the attack came from a US military base! The Congressional hearing in 1999 has all the appearance of aiding the false flag attack by convincing the public that terrorists from overseas were going to attack the USA. The false flag anthrax attack aided in the US decision to invade several Muslim countries including Iraq and Afghanistan as well as drastically increase funding of US government labs for further bioweapons research.”


575 posted on 08/15/2021 7:18:52 PM PDT by LittleLinda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies ]

To: Jane Long

And if that nugget wasn’t bad enough, Dr. Fleming’s team went on to say:

“There has been a lot of effort in part from senior US government officials to blame China for an ongoing bioweapon attack with COVID-19. This effort mimics the dishonest efforts by members of the US government to accuse certain Muslim nations of having weapons of mass destruction and attacking the US with anthrax in
2001. There is actually little evidence tying China to the COVID-19 outbreak except that NIH sent a lab in Wuhan millions of dollars for research. The first clinical cases resembling COVID-19 appeared in April of 2019 in the USA and the first nucleic acid sequences of the virus were detected in Spain in March of 2019. The first deadly outbreak of a respiratory illness resembling COVID-19 in a senior living facility occurred in Springfield, Virginia in Fairfax County in July of 2019. Not surprisingly the notorious US bioweapons facility, Fort Detrick, was also closed down in July of 2019 for an extended period of time. All of this occurred long before the outbreak of COVID-19 occurred in Wuhan, China in October of 2019.

Based on witnessing what I perceived as illegal bioweapon
activity while training at NIH and witnessing suspicious activity for an additional 30 years while working in the vaccine field, I believe that one needs to be very cautious about the COVID-19 vaccines. I believe that the organizations most likely to release a follow up attack to the anthrax attack would be the same organizations in the US who initiated the original anthrax attack and were never prosecuted. These same institutions/organizations
are promoting the COVID-19 vaccines.

Dr. Joseph Moshe, an American virologist, came forward to warn the public about bioweapons by admitting that he was part of an organized group deliberately poisoning vaccines to use as a bioweapon. There have been accusation that tetanus immunization programs in many third world nations actually injected tetanus vaccine spiked with HCG, human chorionic gonadotropin to induce infertility. The Catholic Church in Kenya called for a halt to tetanus immunization programs after the church’s own consultants found 30% of the tetanus vaccine vials contained HCG. This fact lead many to believe that the immunization program was a deliberate attempt to make the recipients infertile. It is hard to explain how a human hormone, HCG, would end up in a tetanus vaccine created from bacteria in a process devoid of human cell products.

The novel COVID vaccines create potential hazards that could be worse than the COVID-19 infections. If the COVID-19 epidemic is indeed the result of an bioweapon attack originating from within the US government, as was the anthrax attack of 2001, then one or more of the COVID vaccines could also be bioweapons. Criticism in the lay press comprising false and misleading statements from non-experts regarding a scientifically sound peer reviewed paper linking the COVID-19 vaccines to risk of prion
disease suggests the paper’s conclusion are on the mark!

The potential vaccine recipient must think carefully about the real risk of COVID-19 to him or herself before receiving a COVID-19 specific vaccine.”


585 posted on 08/15/2021 7:32:31 PM PDT by LittleLinda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies ]

To: Jane Long

Have been sharing with ‘vax’d friends/family, who’ve had these shots and have now come down with china flu, or are experiencing other adverse effects and/or remorse.

I saved as pdf, and printed, all of his protocols out, the other day.
________________________________________________________

I finally found the protocols. There’s a TON of information on Dr. Fleming’s site. FYI - ivermectin is the generic name of the medication, Stromectol is the brand name. In the last couple of weeks, we’ve been discussing the difference between them and the availability of both. I’ve got it now.


597 posted on 08/15/2021 7:56:32 PM PDT by LittleLinda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson