Replies

TICKER GUY SAYS COLLECTIVE ACTION IS BETTER:

Among those who conclude that the balance of risks and benefits for them does not favor the jab, and who are being coerced, there is one final point to consider: You are not alone. Further, we have an extremely tight labor market, so you have all the power in this debate.

USE IT!

If even 10%, say much less 20% of an organization refuses such a mandate and any “penalty” (e.g. “test daily or get jabbed”) and your employer decides to fire you all for your refusal they collapse.

I don’t care if this is the VA health system, a local hospital or other organization.

You may or may not, in the fullness of time, also be able to successfully sue but in the meantime if 1 in 5 employees is removed there is no way the firm survives that event without severe or even critical damage that collapses the enterprise.

Collective action — that is, a strike — is how gross abuses were dealt with in the past and is a non-violent and entirely-legal act.

Simply put: REFUSE.

Let them try to get your 20% of the output from the other 80% of the remaining staff. They will fail; a decent percentage of the remainder will blow up medically due to stress and similar and suddenly they’re not down 20% on their labor they’re down by half.

WHEN they blow up and come crying to you to come back to work you demand double your previous pay — permanently — and no, you still will NOT take the jab nor be discriminated against on masks and tests.

Collapse all entities that attempt to enforce mandates.

Go to responses (registration required to post)