[grey_whiskers]

A photo does not constitute isolation, nor does it allow sequencing.
You really are that stupid and dishonest, aren’t you?

...incidentally. On the internet nobody knows you’re a dog.
A photo on the internet doesn’t prove it’s really the COVID 19 virus in the photo, either. Not nearly as hard to deepfake, and harder for a layperson to detect photoshop.

[Renfrew]

“A photo on the internet doesn’t prove it’s really the COVID 19 virus in the photo, either. Not nearly as hard to deepfake, and harder for a layperson to detect photoshop.”

A quick search of Google Scholar gives 20,000 papers so far published on using electron microscopy to study SARS-CoV-2. Are you suggesting all 20,000 of them are faked?

https://scholar.google.ca/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=%22SARS-CoV-2%22+electron+microscopy&btnG=&oq=%22SARS-CoV-2%22+electron+mic

[reformedliberal]

A photo on the internet doesn’t prove it’s really the COVID 19 virus in the photo, either. Not nearly as hard to deepfake, and harder for a layperson to detect photoshop.
______________________________

Absolutely.

One of the flagrant apologists sent me those photos as proof Covid 19 existed. At that moment, I thought exactly what you just posted and realized there was no way to dialogue with these believers. I thanked him and have not engaged since, nor do I usually pay much attention to his assertions.

Yesterday, I read a post somewhere and learned that dying cells present a crown (or corona) during apoptosis (death). I found that interesting.