Posted on 08/07/2021 4:44:18 AM PDT by ransomnote
p
“My A1C went down by .1 since my COVID jabs.”
So..... does that make you simply an airman?
From the article:
“Dr. Martín Monteverde: I asked 13 questions referring, first of all, to the vaccination issue. Because just yesterday, it was confirmed that the Moderna vaccine and the flu vaccine have graphene oxide nanoparticles inside. Inside the vial. We already had the confirmation that there were also graphene oxide nanoparticles in the Pfizer and AstraZeneca vaccine. “
Has anyone who had the flu shot, but not the covid shot, had a magnetic spot on their arm?
Time to triple up on your tin foil.
Physical isolation of actual specific covid-19 virions, troll-boi.
I thought the jabs were safe because the body was supposed to destroy all the viral mRNA within (say) 24-48 hours post-injection.
So real genuine coof virus mRNA has magical cloaking devices to shield it from Dcp1/Dcp2 decapping enzymes and exoribonucleases?
...what's the detection limit on the mRNA in human tissue or blood? What methodology is used?
Troll.
If the actual sample has never been isolated, how do you guarantee that the string you posted matches the so-called “real” virus?
“Physical isolation of actual specific covid-19 virions”
Exciting news, we have that too! Photos of Covid-19 interacting with human cells:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-73162-5
That leaves chain-of-custody questions about their sample, before having to admit that the graphene oxide is real.
A photo does not constitute isolation, nor does it allow sequencing.
You really are that stupid and dishonest, aren’t you?
...incidentally. On the internet nobody knows you’re a dog.
A photo on the internet doesn’t prove it’s really the COVID 19 virus in the photo, either. Not nearly as hard to deepfake, and harder for a layperson to detect photoshop.
“If the actual sample has never been isolated, how do you guarantee that the string you posted matches the so-called “real” virus?”
The joy of science is it is replicable and testable.
Take a nasal swab of someone with Covid, sequence it, and you will find a version of this genome.
Take a swab of someone without Covid (which includes any samples from pre-2019) and these sequences will not be found.
This is an easy test to do, and since every major hospital in the world can do this work, is has been done more than a million times so far.
That’s funny. The CDC test uses what they claim is detection of antibody reactions to nasal swabs; they do not do the viral sequencing routinely on individuals, and do not make that technology available.
Nice try, moron.
Oh, that’s right.
The titers are low enough they use PCR to amplify the sample.
And the guy who won the Nobel for PCR said it should never be used for diagnosis.
Suck it dry, troll-boi.
Please remind me how one of the recently assassinated African leaders submitted samples from things like fruit and from goats, and they tested positive for Coof.
Because SCIENCE!™
Troll.
“A photo on the internet doesn’t prove it’s really the COVID 19 virus in the photo, either. Not nearly as hard to deepfake, and harder for a layperson to detect photoshop.”
A quick search of Google Scholar gives 20,000 papers so far published on using electron microscopy to study SARS-CoV-2. Are you suggesting all 20,000 of them are faked?
“they do not do the viral sequencing routinely on individuals, and do not make that technology available.”
Yes, they do so routinely. Here is a public database of all the Covid genomes sequenced in the US. It’s so far over a million:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sars-cov-2/
The great part about science is it is open and verifiable. Everyone of them has the lab and the lab tech responsible.
I feel at this point I’ve successfully proved who in the conversation is a “moron,” as you so elegantly put it.
Enjoy the rest of your weekend.
Put it this way. If I took a grainy greyscale photo like that, without any metadata attached, and without allowing you to use Google reverse image search or TinEye, would you be able to ascertain definitively, exactly what cell type and virus was involved?
That's the joy of scientific fakery. Goes back to a novel written in the 1930s by a practicing scientist, C.P. Snow, The Search. One of the characters says
"The only ethical principle which has made science possible is that the truth shall be told all the time. If we do not penalize false statements made in error, we open up the way for false statements by intention. And a false statement of fact, made deliberately, is the most serious crime a scientist can commit."
Given
a) the number of multi-billion dollar judgments against Pfizer for CRIMINAL falsifying in the past
b) the untold number of billions of dollars to be made by the mRNA jabs
c) the political pressure to experiment with mRNA jabs outside of the coof as a vehicle for delivery of other therapeutics, e.g. anti-cancer
d) the political pressure for the jab as social control
e) the past history of lies, including in The Lancet, about the origin of the coof as a Chinese-engineered creation
f) the pressure on doctors to not publicize adverse reactions
g) the lies about masking
h) the lies/suppression of HCQ/Ivermectin
i) the lies about "vaccine" efficacy and the shortcuts taken in human trials (duration, size, composition of subject and placebo groups)
The barn door on lying in this situation has been left wide open for more than a year.
Gargling your own reproductive fluids over "Because SCIENCE!"™ doesn't cut it.
“Over a million” sequences.
Presidain’t Biden said over 350 million people in the US have gotten the jab. He was wrong, of course, that’s more than the total population.
But the number of those infected greatly exceeds the number of samples you posted; it is therefore not “routine” which is why I chose to use that word.
Learn to read, troll-boi.
Yes, you have shown yourself to be a moron.
But I appreciate your admitting it before running away.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.