Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp

“Ha ha ha ha ha.”

Is that snark?

The repeal I linked shows that there was no prohibition on using foreign ships after 1830. Only the coastal trade was still prohibited, as it still is today.

Anyway, I will wait for you to show me how any legislation affected Southern ship building, shipping lines, or any other activity as regards the logistics of the cotton trade or other major business activity. I’ll grow old(er) but I’ll wait.


459 posted on 08/02/2021 3:39:30 PM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 455 | View Replies ]


To: SoCal Pubbie; PeaRidge
Is that snark?

It was expressing amusement at your effort of wishful thinking.

Anyway, I will wait for you to show me how any legislation affected Southern ship building, shipping lines, or any other activity as regards the logistics of the cotton trade or other major business activity. I’ll grow old(er) but I’ll wait.

I cannot help but feel you are flippant about this and don't really care about the information because you have already made up your mind to ignore it if it doesn't show what you wish to believe. It is not easy to remember where to find all this, but I managed to find some information on the subject which I had read a long time ago. Thanks to PeaRidge for compiling this information.

I believe there is more, and more detailed information in the linked discussion thread, but I think this addresses your interest in an accurate and somewhat detailed manner.

https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/3443027/posts?page=929#929>

492 posted on 08/09/2021 9:13:03 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 459 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson