That's who Jean Ruby claims took the pictures presented in the video. Did you even watch it?
Typical of you pro-jab trolls.
I'm not pro-jab at all. I am anti conspiracy nutter. So when one of you posts your fevered QCult fantasies (outside of your FR protected "safespace" thread) I'm going to call it out.
Myerson specializes in studies of crystallization from solution.
And that's exactly why his credentials as a professor of chemical engineering matter in regards to the claim that graphene oxide could even be in the vaccine. He certainly knows that graphene oxide is extremely toxic to humans because graphene and its compounds are very much the topic of research by chemical engineers.
Nothing about vaccinations, nothing about cytotoxicity.
The video was all about graphene oxide being in the vaccine. Did you even watch it?
It would take the conspiratorial silence of literally thousands of people who have created and studied the vaccines to conceal the inclusion of a toxin like graphene oxide in the vaccines.
Right, it's beginning to dawn on you.
I didn't watch this video, I don't agree with what's in it, and I didn't rely on it. At most I think it's a "plausible" pending verification; and even at that, I don't know if it would be sabotage or "salting" as it were, instead of a an undocumented ingredient put in all the doses by your favorite Bond villain.
Myerson specializes in studies of crystallization from solution.
And that's exactly why his credentials as a professor of chemical engineering matter in regards to the claim that graphene oxide could even be in the vaccine. He certainly knows that graphene oxide is extremely toxic to humans because graphene and its compounds are very much the topic of research by chemical engineers.
See, there's something besides SCIENCE!™ out there. Politics, and dirty pool.
If someone nefarious were going to be putting graphene oxide into the jabs, they wouldn't automatically contaminate every batch; and they wouldn't necessarily put a fatal dose into every individual jab.
And pretty likely they wouldn't be prominently listing it in the formal ingredients.
He isn't intimately involved in the development of the vaccines; he's interested in crystallization. Which means he wouldn't have consulted on the production lines for the jabs; he has no idea how secure the facilities are, or how rigorous the quality control is. Keep in mind that one of the jabs in (was it in Baltimore) contaminated 15 million doses; and one of the Russian jab manufacturers had its adenovirus component undergoing *recombination* at the factory. There was *supposed* to be an earlier step in which a couple of genes needed for reproduction were removed from the adenovirus, but apparently there was at least one batch where that step got...left out. This was from a Twitter post by a pro-jab troll attempting to prove to me that the vaccines could not alter the human genetic code because they could not reproduce, or something. It was about three months ago.
Not to mention, as an additional example, a bunch of the test kits produced by the CDC under President Trump were...contaminated and so gave false results.
Nothing about vaccinations, nothing about cytotoxicity.
You're missing the point, troll-boi.
You tried to throw a professor under the bus by mis-quoting from his Linked In account, and suppressed or ignored literally the adjacent line, which showed he had relevant experience to some of the things highlighted on the video clip (the teaser photo looked like a photomicrograph of dying cells, hence cytotoxicity being relevant).
The video was all about graphene oxide being in the vaccine. Did you even watch it?
No, because I'm not using it as a source, nor am I relying on it.
It would take the conspiratorial silence of literally thousands of people who have created and studied the vaccines to conceal the inclusion of a toxin like graphene oxide in the vaccines.
No it wouldn't. It would take a knowledge of the manufacturing and quality control process...if one was not making the graphene oxide an official, universal component.
And, I don't see where anyone has published the list of quality control tests on the finished jabs, which would unambiguously reveal the presence of an adulterant or undisclosed ingredient such as graphene oxide.
Not that I want the tests made public knowledge, for obvious reasons. But without knowing the tests, you wouldn't be able to say if the manufacturer (or perhaps, as a final test before injection, the distributors) did anything to check the product, which would have shown the graphene oxide if it were there.