Grandpa Tell Me 'Bout The Good Old Days
Posted on 07/18/2021 5:14:32 AM PDT by Libloather
Interesting how commies alternatly deny and embrace ‘ Conspiracy” isn’t it ?
( weasels)
Come on folks. Grow up.
The insults and name calling add nothing to the discussion.
Re: Q - I never understood FReepers going to the “main” Q thread on FR with the intent of being disrupters. What’s the point in that? You’re just going there to cause trouble. Why?
Some Religion threads used to get that way in the 2000’s - and insults would fly.
Grandpa Tell Me 'Bout The Good Old Days
I refer you to post #63
No, that’s speculation and theory which you have gussied up and presented as fact.
- see https://www.newsfromtheperimeter.com/home/2018/8/16/seattle-suicideplane-crash-q-operation
Key use of words such as “likely”, “source” [secret], “allegedly”, “theory”, “believed” in that article.
Theory is the key.
Why?
Use your words, rabbit.
Q did no such thing.
Put up or shut up.
In the magical world of Furry, anything that is a 'theory' can't possibly be true. Even if the circumstantial evidence adds up to something, it is definitely nothing.
And we wonder why the derps win? It must be nice for them to have our own people covering for them.
Define 'we', rabbit.
It most certainly did...drop #133 was the earliest reference.
How is it that I know Q better than you?
There is a rational explanation of the so-called missile launch.
Q-anons are just too dumb to believe it.
You’re lying through your foul teeth.
Q was linking Covid to election fraud months *before* the election.
For another, that post was not from Q.
The watermark shows it was created on deviantart.com.
Learn to read instead of just making random stuff up, and then projecting onto Q followers.
Good post.
I keep being reminded of a meme:
“Anyone got any good conspiracy theories? All of mine have come true.”
A major problem, as I see it, is that too many people are uncomfortable with anything outside the manipulated mainstream consensus. Humans want to fit in and be liked. Yeah, sure: everything needs to be run through a filter of logic, probability and known science. However, way too much of what has been accepted as *known* keeps being upended by discoveries of revisionism, hidden facts and outright falsehoods.
Personally, I ran into this situation about 25 years ago when researching a local issue that ended up leading to a myriad of rabbit holes. I cannot pinpoint the time when the unease turned into a huge gut-punch. I had to withdraw and regroup and cease talking to anyone outside a small circle of trust. Then I watched those same rational, sometimes fairly unimaginative, folks reach similar conclusions and go through the same response I’d experienced. Over the years, some would sidle up to me and whisper:”How did you know back then?” Others would say “You were right.”
Not that it mattered, in the end. Most will still go along to get along.
Anyone had former skeptics just shake their heads and declare:”Alex Jones was right all along.”? I have and from what I can discern, this demoralizes more than empowers the speaker.
Most of what we “have always known” keeps turning out to be false.
When that becomes inescapable, what’s left?
So you admit you like to swallow...specious explanations.
Ahh, yes. The super secret military operation that posted classified intel on Chan boards mostly known for Nazi propaganda and child porn. Yeah, totally legit.
And Q post 1 - Hilary arrested, no deal. Hahahaha
That’s not even a non-sequitur.
Q post 1 is part of the Q apocrypha now. I’m sure one of the Q faithful will be coming along shortly to tell us why Clinton was never arrested.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.