Posted on 07/16/2021 6:50:53 PM PDT by bitt
There's a potential nuke of a case in Georgia on Monday at 13:30 regarding the Georgia Senate runoff from January 5th that has a very good chance to flip the Senate back to the GOP. I'm trying not to use click-baity words in titles, so you tell me if this is a possible "nuke":
This one is different because it involves the Georgia Senators and not President Trump. If it moves forward, clowns Stacey Abrams and RINO rat Raffensperger would be deposed, and best of all, the judge has the authority to call for a new senate election, shifting control back to the GOP.
"But DC, it will get stuffed by some Soros-owned deep-state judge! Nothing ever happens and we're all gonna' lose!!".
No. The judge is the same one who's been handing out court wins in our favor like candy to Garland Favorito: Judge Brian Amero.
According to The Justice Society founder Mike Daugherty, who filed the lawsuit, he says they have several advantages.
The main advantage is this is a State of Georgia case regarding Georgia law specifically. It's not about Trump, the presidential election, and nothing federal. He says this makes it much easier to argue.
He says the case is simple: election laws were broken, therefore the January 5th runoff election was illegal.
Daugherty says the main objective for Monday is to survive motion to dismiss. He doesn't couch his words: "If we survive motion to dismiss, the Senate flips back to red".
He says the ground paved by Favorito is a big benefit to the case, because they're stocked to the brim with evidence, and if they make it to discovery, it's game over.
In the end, Judge Amero has the authority to call for a new election. Even better, there's recent Georgia precedent for a judge to order a new election.
Here's the interview with Mike Daugherty on John Fredericks' show (starts at 25:43):
That is awfully simplistic. I am sure the legal geniuses of the left can provide us a more nuanced understanding of why this is all ok.
His will.
All we can do is ask.
Precident doesn’t allow a state to call back its Federal congressperson, so the possibility the courts will recall these imposters is very, very slim.
....McConnell surrendered the Senate without a whimper.
More than not wanting to lead the Senate, perhaps he doesn't want to see Donald Trump back in the WH.
^^ THAT ^^
Even if this Judge is as honest as claimed, you can bet behind the scenes the Swamp is making him an offer he can’t refuse.
Maybe you read a different article. This does not involve the Republicans or political power, this is a legal issue in Georgia that will be decided by a judge.
We already know the Republicans are not up to the task.
(Am I on your ping list?)
you are now!
Alright! New elections! Fire up the Dominion, drop boxes and mailin ballots!
Oh, thank God that judges and courts in Georgia aren’t political. Solving this obviously fraudulent election will require Republicans to exercise GOVERNMENT power. We will not tax cut our way out of this.
The GOP have no interest in being the majority in the Senate or House. They are only interested in fooling Republican voters. That has always been their role in the Uniparty.
McConnell couldn’t be more disinterested in reclaiming leadership, due to election fraud. They’re happy Trump is gone, and happy to let the Democrats do whatever they want.
The only difference now, after Trump came along, is they don’t even try to hide it anymore. It was so obvious they wanted to lose the House in 2018.
LET RUBY SPEAK!
I was hoping for a ‘targeted’ lightning strike - but this works just as well
And what will counter the argument that the runoff election was the ‘new election’?
“He says the case is simple: election laws were broken, therefore the January 5th runoff election was illegal. “
It’s not that simple. The case has to me made that the illegal actions would have have effected the results.
yuge
The Law is not enforced without prosecution.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
that’s good to know
election laws were broken, therefore the January 5th runoff election was illegal.
That is awfully simplistic. I am sure the legal geniuses of the left can provide us a more nuanced understanding of why this is all ok.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
the dems HAD to rig the elections to save the nation from the orange man
The deep state will probably fry his daughter's boyfriend in a car to send a message, like they did with that other official.
Change 'illegal' to UNLAWFUL, and you match existing statutory law regarding the plenary world of US election law.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.