But now they’re saying the “vaccines” don’t prevent infection but they reduce hospitalization.
They are lying SOBs.
Here’s some more from Karl-Go read through his excellent articles and analysis at the link I provided above:
These “vaccinations” lack said scientific and publicly-disclosed data. In fact there is evidence of intentional concealment and lying related to the said data, along with deliberate coercion to not report adverse events.
There is further evidence in the slide deck presented to the FDA prior to the EUA approvals that these adverse effects were known risks and investigation to determine the scope and scale of said risks (e.g. close monitoring via blood work in the study participants) was not undertaken.
Since the risks are now documented (via the “fraction of a second” slide since uncovered during said presentation) to have been known this refusal to investigate was deliberate.
In addition the reason it takes so long to qualify a vaccine is that only with an extended period of time do you learn whether actual protection against infection and transmission occurs.
The presence of antibodies is not sufficient and neither is very small absolute risk changes; the former has zero scientific proof of efficacy and the latter has no statistical power; to otherwise state is fraud.
Now we are learning that not only are the adverse effects real, evidence is emerging that as with every other attempt at vaccinating against a coronavirus transmission is not interrupted nor is infection, meaning that all you have left is potential personal reduction of serious or fatal outcome risk.
***For people without significant morbidity factors it appears, now that we have solid data emerging on same, that the absolute risk reduction compared with the adverse effect risk is profoundly unsound on a statistical and medical basis for both healthy young people and healthy adults.****
“Strong urgings” without facts that the government and private industry both have at this point and are refusing to disclose must be met with a stern “NO.”
If said “strong urging” is attempted to be turned into a mandate via any form of coercion whatsoever, including employment or educational sanction or disability that attempt must be met with whatever amount of pre-emptive force is necessary to stop it, as at that point we’ve gone from attempting to convince people to do a dangerous thing by intentionally refusing to disclose the evidence what is proposed is dangerous to actual attempted manslaughter or worse ..snip..
It's called desperation.
They have to give people SOME reason to take the shot.
If/when people realize that the injections don't do that either, they will have lost all credibility and good luck convincing people next time, although considering the lemming like gullibility and general stupidity of the human race, I'm not so sure ........