I don’t honestly trust the findings related to the center
fuel tank theory.
In one of my posts I touched on the damage these agencies
did to themselves. After watching their actions in this
case I don’t believe much of anything they say. Other
people far better informed than I am on these matters, felt
the same way I did about it.
As for other aircraft, I don’t believe an aircraft of that
same type of aircraft ever blew up due to a center fuel
tank explosion. There may have been one.
You have far too much to explain away for the center fuel
tank theory to hold water.
If the center fuel tank explodes, parts of the aircraft will
spread equally from the flight path. They didn’t.
The debris was heavily tossed off center. I forget the side
now, but it wasn’t even close to even disbursement.
That is just one more reason why a missile was deemed to
be likely.
There have been no other 747s, but there have been two 737s, a 727 and at least one 707. One of the 737s was on the ground. Definitely no missile there. I suppose I should look these incidents up and find links.
You have far too much to explain away for the center fuel tank theory to hold water.
I would say there is far more to explain away for the navy shoot down theory. The center tank explosion is relatively simple. A nearly empty tank heated to above the flash point of the fuel, and then a spark from chafed wires. I wouldn't think the explosion would tear pieces off the aircraft like in the movies. I would think it just has to compromise a few bulkheads and that would be enough for the fuselage section in front to rip off. But what do I know?
Still seems more plausible than the navy shooting it down. Can you explain the step by step sequence of what a room full of sailors would have to do to shoot down an airliner with a live missile and then how to cover it up?