Replies

More from Karl Denninger I am not including the entire discussion of each key point, just the beginning excerpts:

Before we do anything further we must establish all of the following for the existing shots.

We must force the existing manufacturers and FDA to prove that giving someone a vaccine if they have pre-existing resistance has value to them in reducing serious or fatal outcomes, and by how much.

80% of the population had known resistance to Covid-19 before the virus got here. The study establishing this was first published in the summer and then, peer-reviewed, was released in September before the first jab went into the first arm. ...snip...
********************

We must force both pharma and the regulators, along with our government at all levels to account for now-apparent, clear and outrageous failure of the existing shots along with the flat-out lies being told today as regards their efficacy.

Specifically, 100 out of 700 (1/7th) of the crew on the HMS Queen Elizabeth have become infected with Covid-19. Every one of the crew was fully vaccinated and thus any attempt to blame this on “plague rats” that aren’t vaccinated is obvious bull****.

I note that this rate of infection (14%) is within statistical spitting distance for population pre-existing resistance as documented in June of 2020 (80%) which strongly implies that the jabs are very close to worthless if not completely worthless in preventing both infection and transmission.
*******************

We must identify and publish detailed, de-identified associated harms from the jabs and norm them to the population segment and existing morbidities as a whole.

Every health insurance company in the private sector and CMS (Medicare and Medicaid) have this data and, since the vaccine rollout is in fact not “free” if you’re insured (it’s billed to your insurance company) the firms know conclusively what events coincided with or were closely associated with these shots and how that compares with their last five years of data in the same population and morbidity segments.

In short the data across over 150 million Americans does exist to show what, if anything, is happening and at what rate. ...snip...
************************

We must have full, free and open access to inexpensive and known safe drugs for early interdiction as an option. This means Ivermectin, Budesonide and HCQ + Doxycycline or Zpak for starters.

All of these are drugs that are known to be quite safe, they are all off-patent and inexpensive and it must be the choice of the patient whether to use them if suspected or confirmed infected. It is their ass, not the doctor’s, and thus their choice....snip...
*******************
We must have full debate on the apparent fact that out of Israel the data is that you are almost seven times more likely to be infected with Covid-19 if you got vaccinated as opposed to having recovered from the infection naturally.

This feeds directly into the point above; even if the above drugs have some effect but are less effective than a vaccine if the result of infection is seven times the immune resistance to a subsequent infection then the better option is to treat early and fast rather than vaccinate for all but the most-seriously morbid. That’s the math.
*********************
We must hold the media and government accountable for the repeated lie that “all the deaths (and hospitalizations) at this point are unvaccinated people.”

No they’re not.

Fact: Massachusetts accidentally told the truth; about 20% of the recent Covid deaths have been in vaccinated people.

This sort of repeated bull**** isn’t an accident it’s a flat-out lie promulgated for the explicit purpose of convincing you to do something dangerous.

This wasn’t a mistake or accident, it’s intentional with actual knowledge of falsity and thus must be treated as manslaughter. We are well-past the point where the deceased’s families and friends should insist on blood for these lies.
*******************

We must have the data on the spread of adverse events between the first and second jab for two-dose regimes and, before anyone proposes a third, prove, scientifically, that there is no expansion of risk ratios with subsequent jabs. If that cannot be done then any such attempt must be denied until and unless it is.

********************
We must norm the denominator of risk of the shots against the base risk you accept if you get infected. Johns Hopkins has put up an online calculator for the latter.

How accurate it is I do not know but it makes clear that there’s no argument for a non-morbid person of under 50 to take the vaccines as on the VAERS data we have now they are more-dangerous over a year’s time than infection is, and we know VAERS, being voluntary, understates the true adverse event rate. ...snip...
************************
“Cases” are meaningless, even if symptomatic. We don’t shut down society or scream at people over a symptomatic cold or flu.

What matters is serious disease and death.

I have repeatedly pointed out all the way back to the start of this thing that we must accept and live with this virus. It is not leaving and due to having animal reservoirs we will never be rid of it.

That’s a fact, like it or not. That we have never successfully vaccinated against a coronavirus is also a fact, like it or not.

We are now finding that the virus is escaping the vaccines and the evolutionary pressure we are putting on it via them is exactly as I and a few others expected to happen based on history; we went down the wrong road. ...snip...
********************
We’re 18 months into Covid-19 and seven months into jabbing people; there is utterly no excuse for failing to present hard data which every health insurance company and CMS has.

The only reason not to present it is that the data makes clear that the jabs are causing significant harm and nobody wants to talk about the actual denominator and put it up against, for example the NY Coroner’s data as to your relative risk of Covid-19 killing or seriously injuring you if you get infected. ...snip...
*********************

I strongly support vaccinations that are in turn supported by scientific, publicly-disclosed data without evidence of fraud or concealment. There are myriad vaccinations where this is the case; measles, polio and even Chicken Pox.

The latter, I remind you, took twenty years to develop said scientific evidence to a sufficient level and authorize it for use in children, despite the known fact that if you got Chicken Pox not as a child, but as an adult you were 25x more likely to wind up in the hospital or die.

These “vaccinations” lack said scientific and publicly-disclosed data. In fact there is evidence of intentional concealment and lying related to the said data, along with deliberate coercion to not report adverse events.

There is further evidence in the slide deck presented to the FDA prior to the EUA approvals that these adverse effects were known risks and investigation to determine the scope and scale of said risks (e.g. close monitoring via blood work in the study participants) was not undertaken.

Since the risks are now documented (via the “fraction of a second” slide since uncovered during said presentation) to have been known this refusal to investigate was deliberate.
...snip...

To read the entire article click the link below:

https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?blog=Market-Ticker-Nad