Powers that be suppress the truth about COVID-19
Commentary: Opinion of Richard J. Eggleston Jun 13, 2021 Updated 15 hrs ago Comments
Many years ago, the Union of Concerned Scientist first described a “disinformation playbook” used for decades by corporations to delay or block government action on matters that would adversely affect their profits.
This included:
1. The fake — Fake science is passed off as legitimate. For years, tobacco companies used fake science on the harms of tobacco.
2. The blitz — Scientists who speak inconvenient facts about the organization, such as the NFL and traumatic brain injuries, are discredited or question the non-beneficial gain or function of COVID-19 viruses, funded by Dr. Anthony Fauci.
3. The diversion — Ignoring evidence of the uselessness of commercial masks for COVID-19 prevention, but when worn over our eyes do prevent reading his emails. The COVID-19 virus origin from China, buried by Fauci, ignores almost 5,000 deaths and 8,822 serious reactions to COVID-19 vaccines reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System.
4. The screen — Credibility is bought by alliances with academia and professional societies. Here Perdue Pharmaceutical used these to hide the dangers of opioids, producing an epidemic of addiction and 100,000 deaths. Harvard professors, funded by the Sugar Research Foundation, stated excess sugar is not harmful to health.
5. The fix — Federal agencies didn’t investigate COVID-19’s origins because it may “open a can of worms,” and nonprofits (i.e. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation) influencing the current “together trial” to state “no benefit with Ivermectin.”
...skip...
Besides WHO, where is this disinformation coming from?
1. Big Pharma sells billions of vaccine doses for multiple billions of dollars — Moderna projects it will take in $18.5 billion — not to mention a continual supply of “booster” jabs. The NIH has partial ownership of vaccine intellectual property rights.
2. Merck and Pfizer are developing oral anti-virals against shingles, HIV and Dengue fever based on the Ivermectim platform. These can be patented and therefore are very lucrative.
3. Astra-Zeneca is developing antibody products. Ivermectin is a direct competitor.
4. The sales of Gilead’s antibody product, Remdesivir, will crash.
5. Mexico, India and many other countries’ empty hospital beds are due to expanded Ivermectin use. Obviously, many entities want Ivermectin to disappear.
Other Ivermectin disinformation sources should be the most trusted. Medical journals, such as JAMA, Lancet, Nature and Chest are supported by pharmaceutical ads. They all rejected the largest, 600-patient prospective RCT from Egypt showing hospital rates with Ivermectin of 1 percent vs. 22 percent standard of care and mortality rates of 2 percent vs. 20 percent, respectively. These types of rejections are common.
Most of the world governments and institutions are acting like they have earned our trust. They have likely lost it. Patients want free flow of information with accountability.
ICYMI:
FLCCC Chief Medical Officer Issues Video Statement on “Wasteful and Unnecessary” U.S. Supply Agreement with Merck
The Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance Logo
The Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance
Dr. Pierre Kory: “This is a colossal waste of taxpayer money.”
WASHINGTON, D.C., UNITED STATES, June 14, 2021 /EINPresswire.com/ — In a video message released today, Pierre Kory, M.P.A., MD, president and chief medical officer of the FLCCC, details how the U.S. government plans to spend $1.2 billion on a drug that, if approved, will have limited use against COVID-19.
At the same time, numerous clinical trials of ivermectin show that it is highly effective in both the prevention and treatment of multiple phases of the disease, and yet it continues to be ignored by government and medical authorities.
The link to the video is HERE.
TRANSCRIPT:
As one of the world’s experts in the use of ivermectin for COVID-19 I feel compelled today to make a statement. And that statement is in response to the recent announcement by the US government, that they’re entering into a contractual agreement with Merck where they’re going to commit $1.2 billion of taxpayer money in order to enrich Merck for a drug which has already been the source of a whistleblower complaint, and which has already failed in hospitalized patients.
They are now testing in outpatients, when we already have a drug which is low cost, safe, widely available which has been proven to work in many phases of disease—not only as outpatients but in in-patients.
And so to do so while we now currently have five published review papers from independent panels from across the world, showing how effective ivermectin is. We have over 20 randomized control trials showing large statistically significant benefits in mortality.
And yet, we plan on giving money to a drug company for a drug that is in no way going to surpass what we already have available right now and can use that money should instead be given to supply ivermectin to the country.
This is a colossal waste of taxpayer money. We know this drug works, we’re seeing it work around the world we now have evidence from multiple countries who’ve adopted it into their guidelines.
What happened in Mexico is they emptied their hospitals, and they’ve essentially rid the country of COVID using ivermectin.
We just got a report from Argentina, where their program is showing large reductions in the need for hospitalization. And the crisis in India in a number of states was turned back, with widespread use of ivermectin.
We should not be spending or giving any more money to a drug company who has behaved in the way that it has around ivermectin.
I need to call attention to how disturbed I am at Merck’s actions on February 5 when they issued a statement that there was no evidence to support the efficacy of ivermectin.
...snip...
Great stuff, I forget where I read it but I recall seeing a piece that claimed that gates has plans to destroy ivermectin by making it a pill or liquid and than contaminating it so it never works.
Also hers another unique story I had not read before.