There was a dispute that you waded into after they had already quit.
Thanks for that comment, it gives me the opportunity to recap.
To recap: When LJ, acting like a Karen, couldn't get norsky to agree to stop fighting back against bagster, she then condescending wrote:
This.is.not.q.related.
Several posters told her it was q related, and that q talked about satan and evil many times, so then the goalposts changed.
Then she said they were talking about religion and theology, and that type of talk started division.
I guess bagster was talking religion to norsky when he wrote this:
Now, take your false, sanctimonious, unsolicited piety and go get your f’ng shine box, Padre.
Do you suppose it's the padre at the end that makes it a religious discussion? LOL
:You can go back and read for yourself. There was no conversation about theology going on, just norsky pointing out that demons and satan exist, and bagster belittling him for it. One more point, I have no affiliation with norsky. As far as I know, we have never even had a conversation before.
Then she freepmailed me. I responded. She freepamailed me again, I responded. She freepmailed me again, I responded. She freepmailed me telling me to STOP FREEPMAILING HER. I responded.
She did write this to a fellow poster in post 1900:
“It should also stop freepmailing nastygrams.”
If you see to whom she is responding, this comment is clearly about me. I guess she didn't think I would see it. The very idea that she would call me “It” seems pretty nasty to me. Maybe I'm wrong.
When the word nasty is used like this, I would assume my posts to her would have name calling in them, or lying, or cussing. Not the case. ASk her if I can release both.
That's when the flying monkeys showed up. You know the drill. Stop disrupting the thread! Take it off line! (I really love that one, I am to be castigated on a public forum and then respond in private?) I don't think so. Every comment was addressed solely to me. Not bagster, not LJ, just me.
Last point. If you go back and look at what bagster wrote to norsky, and then to me, it is really troubling. He talks about how he has been so very patient in not speaking up about religion in the last 4 years. He also wrote:
For four years I have listened to people hype their religous beliefs (crazy or not). I don't recall one time telling any of them they were ‘wrong’, then proceed to lecture them on what was ‘right’.
Do I get a ‘thank you very much’, Uncle Bagster? No. I get talked to like a two year old that ‘just doesn't understand’.
But I'm the bully, huh?
Bottom line, I don't care one wit about “the poster who shall not be named” If it wasn't for all you karens this would have already blown over. Stop telling everyone else what they can post on this forum.
There was no conversation about theology going on, just norsky pointing out that demons and satan exist, and bagster belittling him for it. Tell me, protector of the weak. Why bring up demons when vampires were the subject? Vampires and the people that believe in them, which was the topic under discussion.
See, you don't even have a clue why you're spazzing out. You're a dizzy broad. I think this is the only way you could get me to talk to you. I think, deep down, you got a thing for me. There's no shame in that. They all do. You ain't no different, other than not even if you were the last crazy lady on the earth, that is.
He talks about how he has been so very patient in not speaking up about religion in the last 4 years.
Interesting spin, Pontius. Considering I said I've NEVER denigrated anybody's religion and even cut the crazies (like Norsky) slack when they go off the rails into psycho-ville.
Damn girl, you got a particular rage goin' on if you gotta twist everything up to make your stupid nonsense make sense. Yer like the crazy ex-girlfriend prototype.
