[plsjr]

Thanks ransomnote, for these threads.

I searched for "superproof" and the exact phrase "Law of War" and did not find this:
LAW OF WAR: THE STORM (Series 1) ⛈⛈⛈ SUPER-PROOF - SPECIAL CHANNEL VIDEO
that was posted here.

I'm interested in FReeper observations about his find.

[RitaOK]

Curious this “source” is allowed up on YouTube, when the best engaged are banned?
Maybe I missed something.

Some are talkers and some are doers.

This man may be spot on, but why youtube permits him to stay findable is a curiosity.

[LittleLinda]

I watched it in its entirety about a month ago when it was first posted here and agreed with the proof-maker’s links to the sections of the Law of War. Many here believe that the US military took control of the government on January 9, 2021, and have been in control since. When Q first started posting the terms “11.2” and “11.3”, we were pretty much unanimous that he was referring to dates in and around the election.

In the last 6 months, a few anons made a different and compelling case that those references were not dates, but were actually sections of the Law of War, a component of international law that regulates the conditions for war and the conduct of the warring parties. I thought his interpretation and discussion of the links between the Q drops and the Law of War sections were quite reasonable.

[ransomnote]

Thanks ransomnote, for these threads.

I searched for "superproof" and the exact phrase "Law of War" and did not find this:
LAW OF WAR: THE STORM (Series 1) ⛈⛈⛈ SUPER-PROOF - SPECIAL CHANNEL VIDEO
that was posted here.

I'm interested in FReeper observations about his find.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I think his Law of War theory has merit. Seems like too many coincidences otherwise. It makes sense on additional levels - the ultimate importance of Q drops.

I looked at his work prior to Q and was disappointed, but I do think his Law of War theory holds up well.