No problem. If you get some interesting information out of it, please post it. I’m kind of punchy from the trip and my mind is not focusing so well on news items.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I went through the whole 55+ minute program & did not cocome away with anything striking about what they discussed.
it some ways it reminded me of the information hang outs from simon parkes & other british info/disinfo pumpers
seemed like a lot of generally info (that could have be source from www) wrapped together and promoted as sensational new “boom”
yes they did hop around to drop names like buck revelle, pierre & justin, bubba to lend to validity of attempted tie in to fabian socialism plot on death of canadian natives.
maybe I’m missing something
I went through the whole 55+ minute program & did not cocome away with anything striking about what they discussed.
it some ways it reminded me of the information hang outs from simon parkes & other british info/disinfo pumpers
seemed like a lot of generally info (that could have be source from www) wrapped together and promoted as sensational new “boom”
yes they did hop around to drop names like buck revelle, pierre & justin, bubba to lend to validity of attempted tie in to fabian socialism plot on death of canadian natives.
maybe I’m missing something
____________________________________
Sorry. Thanks for listening and commenting. I guess it wasn’t my trip exhaustion that made me think I missed something.
I don’t think that David guy is like Simon. He doesn’t discuss whacky stuff so much as engages in “kitchen sinking” in which he tries to tie too members of the cabal together and throws all the many conspiracy theories involving them into one big one.
I wish he would have spent more time discussing the mass grave of Canadian natives that was discovered and what is known about it.
I guess, however, that not much really is known. Do we know how big the grave was? Was it dug in various stages?
Not to be gross, but what ages are the children and how long have the remains been there? Did the children die in different decades? Two different decades? Eight different decades?
If the children all died 90 years or so ago, it could have been some sort of scarlet fever epidemic or something that happened and the orphanage or whatever it was just not wanting to admit they didn’t take such good care of them.
Mind you, I’m not trying to excuse them. But that’s a different scenario than if the deaths took place in different decades.
Even if the children were not in such great health because of malnutrition and a higher than average number of them died more or less naturally over the years from illnesses they couldn’t fight off, you’d expect them to be given a decent burial in a marked grave of their own. It’s not as if the older boys couldn’t help dig proper graves.