Here's the data from VAERS and a percentage of reporting:
| Symptom | From Survey | Total in Vax Pop | Reported in VAERS | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| fatigue | 53.9% | 80,850,000 | 28391 | 0.04 |
| headache | 46.7% | 70,050,000 | 49367 | 0.07 |
| myalgia | 44.0% | 66,000,000 | 5294 | 0.008 |
| chills | 31.3% | 46,950,000 | 39038 | 0.08 |
| fever | 29.5% | 44,250,000 | 45243 | 0.1 |
| joint pain | 25.6% | 38,400,000 | 6300 | 0.02 |
Not even 1%. The closest reporting ratio is 0.1% for fever IOW VAERS reports have between 1/1000th and 1/10,000th of the actual events.
I was given something like page 4 here: https://www.fda.gov/media/146305/download Mine was a single sheet of paper. Unfortunately I had to help my friend who can't walk well and left my sheet behind. It doesn't say "don't report your fever". But only 0.1% of the people with fever reported their fever.
I never once said these vaccines are safe compared to a flu shot. I think they have unknown safety and less safety for some groups like those with stronger immune systems. But the question is what is the rate of reporting of serious side effects, and delay or deletion of such reports from VAERS? That's the only way we can extrapolate actual numbers from VAERS numbers. The Harvard study says "1% of vaccine adverse events " Do they mean only serious? Or are they including the fever which is only 0.1% reported right now.
Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!
So you agree that the VAERS reports are under reported (dog ate homework, time, blah blah blah).
That would seem to indicate that the vax is much worse than anybody is willing to admit, at least any government or'medical' body. And def not no damn slimy politician. OR the derp media.
I do appreciate your concession on that point. The vaxxer jihadis here on FR are loath to admit ANYTHING that would tarnish the good name of this Chinese poison.
They act as if the vax is their best hound dog, and they ain't gonna have nobody back sassing it.
(I hope you don't think your 'under-reporting' theory does anything BUT diminish the vaxxer jihadist talking points.
Cause if you did, that would be odd. You are arguing in support of my position.
