That's the only way we can extrapolate actual numbers from VAERS numbers So you agree that the VAERS reports are under reported (dog ate homework, time, blah blah blah).
That would seem to indicate that the vax is much worse than anybody is willing to admit, at least any government or'medical' body. And def not no damn slimy politician. OR the derp media.
I do appreciate your concession on that point. The vaxxer jihadis here on FR are loath to admit ANYTHING that would tarnish the good name of this Chinese poison.
They act as if the vax is their best hound dog, and they ain't gonna have nobody back sassing it.
(I hope you don't think your 'under-reporting' theory does anything BUT diminish the vaxxer jihadist talking points.
Cause if you did, that would be odd. You are arguing in support of my position.
So you agree that the VAERS reports are under reported Both under and over. Overall they are underreported because of numerous factors that deter people from reporting. But there are obviously overreports in VAERS, pure coincidence and the reporter says so.
Have to subtract all of those. Or leave them in, that's fine too. Either way multiply by ransomnote's multiplier. That was 4 in the vanity I read a few weeks ago. Now it seems to have gone up. That's fine new info. Then compare to expected deaths if you have don't subtracted the coincidences (some are obvious, some are overt).
Or you subtract the coincidences, then multiply the remainder for underreporting, then you get deaths from vaccincation.
You are arguing in support of my position.
LOL. I am arguing in support of valid analysis. The fact that only 0.1% of vax recipients reported their fever to VAERS supports your position. That 's great , but what I think about the vax is much less important than what I think about numbers math and logic.