[EasySt]

There are also these:

Pretty good collection of info here: https://nojabforme.info/

https://www.wnd.com/2021/05/osha-tells-employers-may-liable-adverse-reactions-mandate-covid-shots/

~Easy

[little jeremiah]

Thank you very much, will go through. And OSHA even.

[grey_whiskers]

I don’t have the link handy at the moment, but OSHA has announced they’re not going to be enforcing the part about holding employers liable, for around 1 more year.

[grey_whiskers]

I only skimmed the nojabforme site.

I saw a problem right up front.
Is says the SM-102 is not approved for human or animal use;
that is because that particular formulation is in a carrier fluid of 90% chloroform, and it is the chloroform which has the safety warnings on the MSDS.

If you go to the manufacturer’s original site, you can click on a link to buy it with the solvent removed; presumably, when you do that, you will see the MSDS for the lipid itself.