Hmmm. Well we had Lewinsky turn into a certain descriptive. Getting revenge on a former bunch of work colleagues could be a Lewicka.
Maybe they knew she would order anchovies and limburger on hers?
Good for her. I wonder how her new job search is going. Reminds me of a USPS worker who was being paid less than male workers with the same title. She went to court and won. The next day when she reported for work, she was asked for the first time to help unload the 150lbs mailbags from the mail trucks like her co-workers did.
She quit the next day.
I can’t imagine working around this type of person. I’d be too busy working to make conversation with her.
Of what?
And was the accusation founded or unfounded?
If no one likes you then maybe it’s you.
Lewicka added that this occurred after she had accused one of the staff members.
i think i see the problem...
Here’s an article with a bit more information...
A British woman who was deliberately left out of monthly free lunches at her workplace has been awarded more than $32,000 as part of a workplace discrimination suit.
Malgorzata Lewicka, a receptionist and service adviser at a Ford dealership in the U.K., says the problems started in 2018 after she filed formal complaints about her hours, pay, and gender discrimination. She eventually went to work at another branch of the dealership, but says she was ostracized, and while other staffers were treated to lunch on “pizza Friday” once each month, she was never asked for her order. She was eventually let go in 2019.
An employment judge ruled in Lewicka’s favor, saying, “We accept that the lunches may have been ad hoc and they were informal. However [Lewicka] gave clear evidence that at [the first job site] a manager went around the site taking lunch orders and that she was included. However, when she moved to [the second], she was not asked if she wanted to order or participate whereas other colleagues were. She could have been asked if she wanted to join in.”
The dealership says Lewicka was excluded because her shift ended at 1 p.m. and she was laid off because the company wanted to make the job full-time. The judge didn’t buy that, saying Lewicka was discriminated against for being a single mother with childcare commitments.
32K to get rid of her is a good deal.
I also have been wronged.
I guess the defendant could appeal the decision.
She was a pip to work with. Everyone wanted to be near her.