[fr_freak]

People with extremely low levels of vitamin D in their blood were not more likely to test positive for antibodies to the coronavirus, the data showed. The presence of antibodies -- cells made by the immune system -- suggests past infection.

What the hell kind of disinformation is this?

The claim regarding vitamin D vs the Chinese coronavirus, or vs ANY virus, was never that those with less vitamin D were more likely to be infected. It was always that people with low levels of vitamin D were more likely to suffer greater damage from the virus, while those with high vitamin D levels would recover with far less, if any, symptoms. The rate of infection between the two groups was never the question.

This is some gross misdirection if I have ever seen it.

[grey_whiskers]

Nailed it in one.

Just like the HCQ studies were on already-hospitalized patients and left out Zinc.

An "official" hit job on the treatment, as it were.

[grey_whiskers]

Nailed it in one.

Just like the HCQ studies were on already-hospitalized patients and left out Zinc.

An "official" hit job on the treatment, as it were.