Food for thought about Q. I know I will get flamed for this but I’m not asking anyone to change their minds about “Q” but to critically think for a second.
Simple counter-intelligence procedures. If you know you have a compromised channel of SIG, flood it with disinformation. It instantly becomes useless to your adversary. If you don’t have two sets of cyphers to verify sender, anyone can flood the channel with disinformation. Making the source useless.
note to self. know to self.
believe what i can verify.
hope for the best.
trust in no alphabet agencies, WWG1WWGA
Simple counter-intelligence procedures. If you know you have a compromised channel of SIG, flood it with disinformation. It instantly becomes useless to your adversary. If you don’t have two sets of cyphers to verify sender, anyone can flood the channel with disinformation. Making the source useless.
Even worse, it can be used to lead your adversary to complacency or into the kill box.
60/40 public
There are at least 5 signals sources.
They were synch’d openly.
Then several delta proofs of synch.
After several compromises, one ID was encyrpted properly and securely.
Anons know that all information is needed in the silent war; mid, dis, false and true.
Are the Anons asked to determine which is which?
Or, to simply dig on what is provided and THINK FOR THEMSELVES?
In true Anon fashion, try coming to your own conclusion from the info provided.
If you think the FreeQ-crowd is providing accurate answers, you are sadly mistaken.
We \move\ information injected with common sense and opinion.
This is true, but Q has been quiet since December. No new posts. Do not confuse Q with Anons. They are not the same. Totally separate.