It comes from disputing others, or poster’s sources.
It’s tacky as Hail.
For example... we just “heard” Trump and devout Pence were speaking, again. Trump sent regards to Pence during his heart surgery.
We also heard Lin Wood tell the world that Pence is dirty and worse, and also has a witness to it, and with a Pence victim. Woods specialty is DEFAMATION law. Don’t think he would risk his legacy without due diligence.
He believes this guy. Believes Pence is bad.
Nobody, so far, Nobody has denied what Lin accuses them of. Including Sts. John Roberts nor holy Pence.
In a vacuum and with no trusted news media in sight, even Anons will differ.
You take it in. None of us KNOWS. BUT, somebody is going to be right.
So, why dispute anybody or their sources?
> In a vacuum and with no trusted news media in sight, even Anons will differ.
It’s getting trashy. We went from the Wall Street Journal to New York Post level in no time. I’m not happy about it and I haven’t said anything until now. I’ll go crawl back in my isolated world and continue winning for my family. I keep an eye above frog level to keep abreast of current events but only from VERY trusted news aggregate sites.
A good example is, if there’s a Qish analyst and they still have a Twitter account, they’re probably a derp.
Q said, “Be careful who you follow”. They meant it.
-SB