> In a vacuum and with no trusted news media in sight, even Anons will differ.
It’s getting trashy. We went from the Wall Street Journal to New York Post level in no time. I’m not happy about it and I haven’t said anything until now. I’ll go crawl back in my isolated world and continue winning for my family. I keep an eye above frog level to keep abreast of current events but only from VERY trusted news aggregate sites.
A good example is, if there’s a Qish analyst and they still have a Twitter account, they’re probably a derp.
Q said, “Be careful who you follow”. They meant it.
-SB
Oooo. Well said.
“... if there’s a Qish analyst and they still have a Twitter account, they’re probably a derp.”
....
It’s not hard to separate *hoping True* from the *possibly True*, for me, but only speaking for myself.
What we’ve learned already tells me Anything is possible and Anyone can prove to be not a White Hat, or not a Black Hat, in the end.
I can’t dare argue that Anything or Anyone is patently false or nonsense. I just post it and house it for the time being.
What Q+ knows will defy my expectations. Disinformation in war holds a high purpose, with me.
It’s my lying eyes that put me in a twist.
Eg., I *saw* Sessions and Pence as useless seat warmers who failed Trump, so seeing that and Justice Roberts behavior in court cases, I’m repelled, on a personal level. But, who knows.
Q+ knew, I think.
The best source for actual news is Il Sharko, those he retweets, and new trump sites. And his associates like Scavino, Stephen Miller and others. And his supporters like MTG (did I get that right?), Giuliani, Powell, etc.
The absence of Q messages has opened up a cottage industry of weirdos.