“a.) person gets vax.
b.) person almost immediately gets a stroke.
Seems pretty simple to me”
Logic error.
One of the classics.
From wikipedia:
“Post hoc ergo propter hoc is an informal fallacy that states: “Since event Y followed event X, event Y must have been caused by event X.” It is often shortened simply to post hoc fallacy.”
“Post hoc ergo propter hoc is an informal fallacy that states: “Since event Y followed event X, event Y must have been caused by event X.” It is often shortened simply to post hoc fallacy.” From Bagipedia:
ex bulchitum fulum caca
Which means, in the latin, that if event Y followed event X, the likelihood that X caused event Y is high. More so if the person was reasonably healthy to begin with.
Tell me this, pharma man. Do you believe that every single stroke (just as an example of negative events) would have happened sans the vax? Are you that far gone?
Will you make any argument to protect your lovely vax, no matter how ridiculous?
