Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BeauBo
“Post hoc ergo propter hoc is an informal fallacy that states: “Since event Y followed event X, event Y must have been caused by event X.” It is often shortened simply to post hoc fallacy.”

From Bagipedia:

ex bulchitum fulum caca

Which means, in the latin, that if event Y followed event X, the likelihood that X caused event Y is high. More so if the person was reasonably healthy to begin with.

Tell me this, pharma man. Do you believe that every single stroke (just as an example of negative events) would have happened sans the vax? Are you that far gone?

Will you make any argument to protect your lovely vax, no matter how ridiculous?


121 posted on 04/28/2021 10:00:20 AM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]


To: bagster

“Do you believe that every single stroke (just as an example of negative events) would have happened sans the vax?

According to the VAERS, we are talking about around 200 strokes in the day after the vaccination, out of about 230 million doses administered. Less than one in a million.

We would expect some number of coincidental occurrences, just due to the math. How many?

Every year, about 800,000 strokes occur in the USA - over 2,000 per day.

About 1% of the population was getting a shot every day, so maybe 20 per day might coincidentally have a stroke on the same day.

But strokes and vaccinations are both more common in older people, so the coincidences would likely be more common as well.

So clearly, the majority, if not every single one, is likely just coincidental.


126 posted on 04/28/2021 10:23:58 AM PDT by BeauBo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson