Posted on 04/26/2021 9:04:00 AM PDT by yesthatjallen
That has the makings of a song parody.
36,000 non citizen voters! And we all know that’s just the tip of the iceberg and why Democrats are running a parallel path of importing Democrat illegal aliens and lowering the voting safeguards.
What about the Senate race between McSally and Kelly? I’m sure his victory came about through a huge victory margin in Mariposa
I am sorry but we need the official source of the data in the image. I would not offer the image listing the various voter categories as “authentic” without an independent official source for the data. I definitely would not go sharing the image to others, announcing it as “proof”.
My complaint is not about believing or not believing there was fraud in Maricopa county - I believe there was.
My complaint is that “Worthy Politics” is not offering something that can be promoted as “proof”. As the image itself exists nowhere except on “Worthy Politics” it is totally correct to ask “where’s the true data”? If “Worthy Politics” has official source(s) for the data, they need to reference it with links to the original source.
I wasn't sure of the source. If you know this is clickbait and false please feel free to report this as false information and ask for it to be removed.
I don’t think these forensic auditors will dribble out results. More than likely they will issue an official report after the entire audit has been completed. I’m expecting to find that Trump won AZ by 150,000 votes.
https://bannonswarroom.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/The-Immaculate-Deception-12.15.20-1.pdf
While I don’t believe this news blog either, not one chart in Navarro’s report has numbers. All checkmarks. There are numbers in the text but none in a chart.
Huge, yes... If it’s verified and IF there is a mechanism that still works for a peaceful redress of grievances.
The former will be far easier to find than the latter...
Why is there no link to a source document? Considering they just started the audit on Friday, call me skeptical that we would have this much granular detail so quickly. Why didn’t article include a link, or official statement from those conducting the audit? I’ll wait for the official word rather than what looks like a photo of an excel spreadsheet without any attribution.
We are growing in websites running purely on getting “Conservatives” to go there because the site says something Conservatives believe to be true, whether what the website offers proves that belief or not.
If it goes off in the forest and nobody hears it, NO.
In fairness to Navarro, he does not know the numbers. To put numbers in his report would be nothing more than a guess.
Navarro has been clear from the outset that there needed to be a full audit. His report is very credible and he is saying these are the types of fraud that happened and it should be investigated further.
Quick! Somebody tell the Supreme Court “justices”!
One of my all time favorite Johnny Cash hits! :-)
Hugh or Epic both word imply click bait...lol
If it’s found to have massive fraud the SOS should go to jail. They signed off on it.
and on her knees
You are right. These numbers seem like Navarro’s estimate of possible voting issues. I don’t think the audit has had time to reach any conclusion. The audit seems to be a very careful process. They won’t be releasing preliminary count data.
Maybe these “ghost” voters are the “people living in the shadows”, that Jorge Bush so often talked about.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.