Posted on 04/23/2021 1:10:20 PM PDT by ransomnote
Oh...you mean someone was born subject to the Jurisdiction of Jamaica and is a Jamaican citizen! (Citizen by descent mother was wife of a Jamaican man, neither were American Citizens! See the Jamaican constitution!) If
Amen!
(And time for bed.)
its getting to get the way for a lot of us....
I don’t think he said he was alive, I don’t remember exactly what he said about him.
Weird. Sounds like keeping the myth alive.
nite
Posted on 4/25/2021, 8:08:42 PM by ransomnote
You said:
“I would suggest that that point may have already passed.”
And I thought you meant the natural born citizen thing is too late to fix, or other constitutional principles.
I apologize for the double ping. I accidentally pinged to an old Q thread (1/1/2021) and then pinged to the current thread. :(
It’s a ploy by the demo-commies
Arizona Judge Recuses Himself From Election Audit Case To Be Settled in the Morning After Democrats Shop Around and Hire New Attorney Who Previously Interned for Judge
Excerpt:
Remember with Democrats it’s always about power and they will do anything to obtain and keep it.
Mark
there are people in this world that want everything to go bad, for the economy to crash, for civil war to start, etc etc....all so they can gloat and say "I told you so".....
losers from the git go....
we've all had our dissappointments over the years but can not give up.
And not a WORD on the telly or any MSM. Journalism is DEAD. We will spread the truth. pic.twitter.com/cPr2Cow9TA— Tonia Buxton 🌸 (@ToniaBuxton) April 25, 2021
He would have turned off a lot more followers if he would have endorsed Q. While the best solution, in our minds, might have been to say nothing at all, it was not an option when the knives were really out for Q several months ago.
I learn from listening to him, his co-hosts, and the guests he interviews. He brings timely news articles to the forefront, and gives people a platform for their causes.
The choice is yours, of course, but I just don’t want your comment to immediately turn people off watching the WarRoom.
It’s on from 10-12 and 4-5 CST, and if there is a segment that is uninteresting, just don’t watch that portion, kind of like “Just Scroll Pass It”. 😊
:)
Why doesn’t the AARP seem to care about volatile insulin prices?
Excerpt:
Senator Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) recently made waves claiming that pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) are to blame for the volatility of insulin prices. It’s a bold statement, to be sure. But here’s the thing: the senator is absolutely right...
One fact that may surprise many is that the net price of insulin has been decreasing for years. But much to the dismay of those who depend on the drug to survive, those negotiated savings are rarely shared directly with patients — who see the list price of the drug climbing. As a result, patients with chronic conditions (like diabetes) are paying higher out-of-pocket costs. And unfortunately, PBMs’ business practices only exacerbate the situation.
PBMs — the middlemen of America’s healthcare system—are notorious for raising drug prices, and insulin is no exception. A 2018 study from the American Diabetes Association found that PBMs’ efforts to “negotiate” drug costs actually contribute to higher list prices. This system incentivizes higher list prices and larger rebates — only those discounts are not passed along to patients at the pharmacy counter, leading to higher health care costs.
The real question isn’t whether PBMs bear significant responsibility for higher patient health care costs — they do. Instead, people should be asking: why doesn’t the AARP seem to care?
The frustrating answer is that, despite what the organization may claim, AARP doesn’t actually represent the interests of its members. Rather, it reflects those of its corporate funders: UnitedHealth Group (UHG) — the nation’s largest health care insurance company — and UHG’s wholly owned subsidiary, OptumRx. Each year, those businesses provide AARP with nearly 40 percent of the organization’s entire operating budget, dwarfing the amount received from membership dues. And here’s the kicker: UHG’s subsidiary, OptumRx, is one of the country’s biggest PBMs.
It’s no wonder, then, that AARP doesn’t jump at the chance to call out PBMs for the harm they are causing seniors. The “senior advocacy organization” is financially disincentivized from doing just that. Over the last decade, UHG has paid AARP well over $4.2 billion — funds that have seemingly bought the nonprofit’s fealty. “You don’t bite the hand that feeds you” is an adage the AARP has apparently taken to heart.
*******
A reminder too...President Trump fought for better drug prices when ordering drugs prices on insulin to be affordable for patients.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.