Posted on 04/10/2021 10:16:45 AM PDT by high info voter
Of course this makes sense keeping in mind these injections don't prevent you from contracting a virus nor spreading one per the CDC.
“CRISPR vs COVID-19: how can gene editing help beat a virus?”
“Global detection of DNA repair outcomes induced by CRISPR-Cas9”
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.02.15.431335v1
You antivax kooks are definitely into recycling.
***************
Can you vaxer kooks prove him wrong without using a study from the government?
It’s coming, if you read the Bible, you’ll understand how tough it can get.
No they can’t, there’s too much info from real doctors and scientists that will say these vaccines and others are a terrible thing, but they’re dismissed because they’re not government sources. Let’s trust the government, look where that gets us.
Check this out.. The whole video is great.. especially at the 40:00 mark.. https://rumble.com/vfihbj-attorney-anthony-raimondo-has-evidence-pcr-tests-are-the-bogus-tool-of-fear.html
FYI
https://www.bitchute.com/video/9Qb6OhTrc7Pc/
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1029&context=jicrcr
The same as you. They want people to believe that which they believe to be true. My motive? To get people blinded to the truth, like you, to see it.
This guy's 'conspiracy theory' rings of truth. Its a conspiracy, he calls it that himself, and its a theory. A very believable theory, almost to the point of fact, absent a written confession.
He has perfect credibility. You people call him 'conspiracy theorist' out of programmed reflex, in the same way you call people questioning the covid 'vax' 'anti-vaxxers'.
Its the tried and true way to shut up anyone opposed to your version of the truth. Trouble is, your version of the truth is usually a lie fed to you by liars intent on covering up their deeds. This time is no different, and you are sheeping it up for them, as usual.
Bigfoot and ufo's are not conspiracies. They are a thing, or they are not a thing. Look up 'conspiracy'.
This man's motives are to save humanity from itself, alter the course of history gone terribly wrong, and to stop very bad people from doing a very bad thing.
So you can see the difference between him and bigfoot and ufo's, right? Good. But I appreciate the colorful, if stupid, analogies.
Bagster wrote: “You know this how?” BeauBo wrote: Even a cursory check of his credibility unveils his history of way off base predictions. https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/health-coronavirus-vaccines-skeptic/
|
BeauBo, if you were honest, you'd admit you're just smearing Dr. Yeadon out of blind desperation.
Turning Pfizer Discards Into Novartis Gold: The Story Of Ziarco
forbes.com ^ | Mar 15, 2017 | John LaMattina
Posted on 4/10/2021, 5:21:54 PM by ransomnote
[ransomnote: Dr. Yeadon was formerly Chief Science officer of Pfizer's Respiratory and Allergy division.] Dr. Yeadon co-founded a company with 3 other former employees. Yeadon succeeded in obtaining licensing and funding from their former employer to build their company, which sold at a rumored 1 billion dollars.
(Note: The author is the former president of Pfizer global R&D and served as an advisor to Ziarco in 2013 and 2014.)
This is definitely of interest regarding this:
3/31/21
“Israel: Why Is All-Cause Mortality Increasing?”
https://swprs.org/israel-why-is-all-cause-mortality-increasing/
So that must mean he lost all the knowledge and experience in his head along with the ability to think.
Amirite?
You'll say anything to 'debunk'.
Those are facts.
And what do those 'facts' have to do with the veracity (facts) of the man's words? Don't be a Humblegunner.
He explains the big fraud simply and convincingly well. Thanks.
That's a tall order. The indoctrinated couldn't be honest if they tried.
They start out on a foundation of lies. The truth bounces off them like bullets off Underdog.
“BeauBo, if you were honest, you’d admit you’re just smearing Dr. Yeadon out of blind desperation.”
If you were honest and objective, you would not always revert to ad hominem attacks, like a broken record.
Look up the guy’s record of predictions. I pointed out two whopping errors, totally off the mark.
1. Calling for vaccine trials to be halted, because they would make the female participants sterile. Totally wrong. Dramatic, but totally without merit.
2. In October, he declared that COVID was over in the UK - a month before their biggest wave so far, with the bulk of their deaths. Dramatically wrong.
Now he has his most dramatic claim by far, with nothing tangible of any sort to support it. Biblical, Wrath of God kind of stuff - really incredible, by historical standards.
If you were honest, you would admit that his credibility is diminished (or obliterated) by him making a string of outlandish predictions that were spectacularly wrong.
~~~~~~~~
You're kidding, right? What about the CDC/Brix/FAUCI millions dead lying in the streets predictions?
Yeadon is right - sterility will occur, it just hasn't been acknowledged yet.
Women say they are having heavier and more painful PERIODS since getting their COVID-19 vaccines
Daily Mail ^
Posted on 4/7/2021, 4:23:47 PM by algore
“Yeadon is right - sterility will occur, it just hasn’t been acknowledged yet.”
His objection was that the antibodies produced would prevent placentas from forming. Those antibodies are high two weeks after the first shot - it should have occurred from first shots onward, if he had been right.
He was wrong, yet you defend it blindly, without checking first.
You adhere to the fauci reasoning that says push the vaccine out before they find out what it does.....
The majority of pro-vax trolling relies on keeping the time frame short, sneering that there is no medical evidence, knowing there hasn’t been time for objective studies and federal funding for said studies.
Your assertions align with America’s enemies.
The man used click bait. Zero veracity. I won’t trust his posts going forward.
Your math is wrong.
When the facts of the article don’t align with the headline it’s CLICK BAIT. When the poster changes the headline it’s CLICK BAIT. When the poster won’t use the source URL of the article it is CLICK BAIT.
These things have nothing to do with the man's 'veracity'.
His audience is not the stupid, so nobody cares who you trust. You wouldn't trust the man if he sat in your living room and told you with his mouth.
You have your indoctrination, and no truth, nothing, is going to disrupt it.
But its cute how you use the 'click bait' excuse when you can't argue with the facts.
You are a government drone and sheep.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.