Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: yelostar

“unique and unknown risks to messenger RNA vaccines, including local and systemic inflammatory responses that could lead to autoimmune conditions.”

They keep recycling this crap. Are they saying the spike protein also occurs on normal human cells ? It almost certainly does not.


4 posted on 04/06/2021 10:25:37 AM PDT by libh8er
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: libh8er
They keep recycling this crap. Are they saying the spike protein also occurs on normal human cells ? It almost certainly does not.

These cause the cells in your body to produce something for your body to attack - it's not an external threat that's being killed, it's something your own body produced. THAT'S a big part of the question - when you train your body to attack stuff its own cells produce, how do you guarantee it ONLY attacks the desired objects? And how do you tell the body to stop producing its fake virus once your immune system is trained on that spike protein?
44 posted on 04/06/2021 11:32:19 AM PDT by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: libh8er
Are they saying the spike protein also occurs on normal human cells ? It almost certainly does not.

I love simple explanations, looks like the normal cell hosts the mRNA spike proteins to me.

How mRNA vaccines work
54 posted on 04/06/2021 11:51:37 AM PDT by RushingWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: libh8er
“unique and unknown risks to messenger RNA vaccines, including local and systemic inflammatory responses that could lead to autoimmune conditions.”

They keep recycling this crap. Are they saying the spike protein also occurs on normal human cells ? It almost certainly does not.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I can see why you'd say that based on what little information we're told.

As I research this I've discovered that vaccines were developed without isolated samples of the actual virus.

I started looking back at old NYT articles and others and found that they blur the lines when talking about COvid-19 and the Corona Virus.

For example, the US was waiting for tests for Covid-19, and the first line of the NYT article says the CDC produced contaminated Corona Virus tests. Now, I thought when I read it back then that they were one in the same. I now realize they were obscuring the fact that the CDC was producing (and contaminated) a product which "tests for fragments of material which can be found in related Corona Virus and other materials like human dna, coca cola, and goats." Didn't see that comin'!

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3836654/posts

So reading the content by the CDC etc. it sounds like they are using mRNA to tell your body to produce Corona Virus proteins which your body will learn to fight. That's what they wanted us to think.

However, they selected one of many known spike proteins of related corona viruses, which  most of us have likely produce from prior experience with common illnesses, to put in their vaccines.

The CDC and MSM switch between the terms Covid-19 and Corona-Virus as if they are referring to the same pathogen; that's what they want us to think. But they are using written slight-of-hand to confuse us intentionally. 

Early in the planned-demic, the NYT reported that the CDC produced millions of PCR tests which proved to be contaminated. Upon examination (I think some regulatory agency) it was discovered that the CDC didn't follow it's own protocols and so the tests were being produced in the same room as positive samples of corona virus.

~~~~~~~~~~~~

C.D.C. Labs Were Contaminated, Delaying Coronavirus Testing, Officials Say
NY Times ^ | April 18, 2020 | By Sheila Kaplan

Posted on 4/19/2020, 4:47:00 AM by rintintin

"Problems ranged from researchers entering and exiting the coronavirus laboratories without changing their coats, to test ingredients being assembled in the same room where researchers were working on positive coronavirus samples, officials said. Those practices made the tests sent to public health labs unusable because they were contaminated with the coronavirus, and produced some inconclusive results."

~~~~~~~~~~~~

Back then I was utterly stunned. In a pandemic, the CDC is working with an open container of the pandemic virus which they were screaming was going to kill millions.

But in reality, they had to have had samples of related corona virus. The CDC was using another virus in the corona family as their excuse. So that  fake cover story is proof that the PCR test detects materials other than Covid-19 virus.

And since then I have learned that the PCR, by design, does not test for the Covid-19 virus. That's why the NYT story holds up partly - they had an open container of a related corona virus.

The PCR test can identify a string of material that may be fragments of related corona viruses, or remains of dead Covid virus that you successfully fought off (never became ill).

Sadly the CDC and manufacturers have specified their PCR test to detect strings of material which may be found in Covid, but which can also be found in many differnt materials, including animals, fruit, and Coco Cola. This was not an accident. That's why the PCR has a false positive rate of 90%.

~~~~~~

image.png

More about this info at: PLAGUE OF FEAR 2020 - Part 7 - THE NAIL IN COVID'S COFFIN (freerepublic.com)

~~~~~~~

Here's an article about the PCR written by a former Chief Science officer for Pfizer.
https://lockdownsceptics.org/lies-damned-lies-and-health-statistics-the-deadly-danger-of-false-positives/

He has an impressive resume and is well qualified to weigh in on this topic.

Nothing we're being told is as it seems. The CDC et. al. have been weaponized against us. Since we're talking about the China Virus, I'd say China is behind the absurd abuses we're witnessing. Fauci gave Wuhan development money before the planned-demic, and has promised to give Wuhan money after the planned demic.

58 posted on 04/06/2021 12:05:38 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: libh8er

SMH.


66 posted on 04/06/2021 12:42:05 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: libh8er

Sloan-Kettering thinks so.

https://theirishsentinel.com/2021/04/04/scientists-at-sloan-kettering-discover-mrna-inactivates-tumor-suppressing-proteins-meaning-it-can-promote-cancer/


73 posted on 04/06/2021 12:54:42 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson