[bagster]

But some here will trot those numbers out and rant about how 975 people have fallen and people who are pro-vaccine don't even care about the evil vaccine making everyone fall over.

No they won't.

Cause common sense 'anti-covid vaxxers' know the difference between slipping on the ice and having a stroke or a heart attack or having your entire body light up like you caught on fire and they put you out with a gallon of gas, or a miscarriage.

(seen the pics)

[2aProtectsTheRest]

Too late, they’re already running around with the VAERS numbers as though they actually indicate real vaccine injuries rather than simply adverse events that occurred some time after a vaccination.

[bagster]

Well, anyway. I've seen it stated that VAERS covid adverse events are topping the list of all vaccines in only a matter of months, beating out vaccines that have been in use for decades.

How do you account for that, if ALL (even obviously unrelated events) are reported.

My theory is this. The vax is unsafe and an increase in 'adverse events' shows that, whether they are slipping on the ice or pianos on the head.

Cipher out the percentage in all other vax's obviously not related reportage and you get closer to the real number, deaths included.

I further hypothesise that 'non related' events are a tiny fraction of the true number.

Which leaves us with an unsafe vaxx that you're trying to whitewash for some unknown reason.