How do you account for that, if ALL (even obviously unrelated events) are reported.
My theory is this. The vax is unsafe and an increase in 'adverse events' shows that, whether they are slipping on the ice or pianos on the head.
Cipher out the percentage in all other vax's obviously not related reportage and you get closer to the real number, deaths included.
I further hypothesise that 'non related' events are a tiny fraction of the true number.
Which leaves us with an unsafe vaxx that you're trying to whitewash for some unknown reason.
