[Jan_Sobieski]

This 2017-18 military study of military personnel showed those who received the flu vaccine were at 36 percent higher odds of testing positive for coronavirus (pre-SARS CoV2) when compared to unvaccinated individuals.

In light of this study, it is interesting to note that since 2015 Seniors (65+) have been strongly encouraged by doctors and medical personnel to get a high dose Flu vaccine with four times as many antigens than a regular flu shot.

Given the severity of SARS-Cov2 (COVID-19), administering a 4X flu shot to the elderly in the midst of a SARS-Cov2 pandemic would appear antithetical to protecting this vulnerable population.

[CondoleezzaProtege]

But...
“Flu shot may shield you from severe Covid.”

https://www.webmd.com/lung/news/20201102/get-your-flu-shot-it-might-shield-you-from-severe-covid

And I’ve also heard pneumonia shot may be beneficial as pneumonia is one of the complications for Covid.

[House Atreides]

“...testing positive for coronavirus (pre-SARS CoV2)...”
****************************************************
Well, duh.... “coronavirus in 2017 - 2018” = viruses for colds

Way to blow smoke!

[metmom]

Ping

[Truthoverpower]

Screw vaccines. The industry is evil. And they don’t work at all

The vaccine “ theory “ is INVALID on its face

Let’s assume it’s valid.

You’re injecting directly into your blood stream - dna rna adjuncts preservatives at a concentration of 1 ppm

The body is supposed to react and make antibodies. And provide immunity

Ok. Against what ? What concentration or exposure ? For how long ?

How long does these “ artificial antibodies “ work ? What about the HUNDREDS OF OTHER VIRUSES BACTERIA AND PATHOGENS ?

Now. Let’s consider. The negative side

Potential risks. Just of the “ shot “. Both short and long term

We have plenty of evidence of THAT. ITS SUPRESSED MIGHTILY

you’re much better off. Using multiple methods to immunize against and combat pathogens. That DO NOT INVOLVE INJECTION OF UNKNOWNS INTO YOUR BLOODSTREAM !!!! Hear me

I’ve been researching this since 1984. That long.

There are HUNDREDS OF VACCINES. HUNDREDS

[pfflier]

This 2017-18 military study of military personnel showed those who received the flu vaccine were at 36 percent higher odds of testing positive for coronavirus

I didn't see that as 36% more at risk of contracting coronavirus in the study. It appears to me that the flu vaccine may create antigens or leave blood markers that also trigger a positive coronavirus reading.

[Veto!]

I’m not getting vax. Considering J&J, but not available here. I really don’t want any of them but my son is bullying me. (Would it be unmotherly to call him a jerk?) ,

[Manly Warrior]

If this is based on PCR testing, the probability of testing positive is higher as it tests for commonly found D/RNA sequences and per the inventor, any virus would register as a positive after excessive permutations/magnification.

Inject flu vaccine, test for viral RNA via PCR and voila, there it is! A positive.

[Wuli]

So the fact that I never had the flu vaccine likely made me less susceptible to the Covid-19 bug, a coronavirus.

Yes, the natural human antibody response to invaders is a broader spectrum response than the very specific agents resulting from a vaccine. The human response has to be broader because it is searching for what will work and throwing more than one specific counter attack at the invader. Then the T cells remember what was produced and what worked, bringing out the same army next time.