Replies

‘May not be safe’ and per other reports, the vaccine only reduces the symptoms because the recipient can still get COVID even after the vaccinations.

It seems that half of the info and prophylactics regarding COVID, its symptoms, its severity, its reliefs, etc., have been lies. The problem is in determining which half that is.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Risks have been suppressed, purged, deleted, and denounced as 'dangerous". Lies about the false benefits of the 'vaccines' have papered the world 24/7.

The NIH's website, Pub Med. archived peer reviewed research stating that trial subjects 'should' have been advised that the vaccines have a risk of sensitizing patients who may then develop ADE, and all patients of the vaccine should also receive that warning.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33113270/

The research paper was submitted to Fauci's NIH in fall of 2020. It mirrors 16 year of prior research on failed mRNA vaccine trials for HIV, Hep C etc.

Yet, yesterday I took a screen shot of the the following information from the CDC website in which they defer to the judgement of pregnant women whether to be vaccinated or not, without ever mentioning ADE therefore denying them access to informed consent. If anything, the CDC's information slyly raises fear of illness to drive the patient to accept the 'vaccine'.

Information about COVID-19 Vaccines for People who Are Pregnant or Breastfeeding | CDC

All those pushing this 'vaccine' on an uninformed public use the absence of sufficient data to prove it's a good product and to deny it's a bad product. 'Limited' current data on a technology with 16 years of failure (dead animal trials etc.) becomes the Good Housekeeping seal of approval, or the CDC/UK.GOV seal of approval.

The CDC's VAERS database lists the Covid vaccines at the top of the page (as of March 26, 2021) among 93 other FDA approved, established vaccines in the number of deaths observed following vaccination. This doesn't prove the vaccine caused all deaths - but all other vaccinations faced the same observation level and had fewer records of deaths, injuries. How can a 'vaccine' administered 3 months have more deaths than polio or other vaccines available for 10 or more years?

The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) Request (cdc.gov)

I think the public has cause to be concerned that the Pfizer and Moderna's vaccines are #1 and #2 for deaths reported out of 225 total vaccines recorded in VAERS. Note the Covid vaccines have only been in use for three months, and #3 for reported deaths as been in use since 2004 (Oromune Polio Vaccine).

Despite all this, they have begun testing the Covid-19 vaccines on children:

Shots in little arms: COVID-19 vaccine testing turns to kids

3/28/2021, 5:44:31 AM · by ransomnote · 43 replies

kstp.com ^ | March 24, 2021 | kstp.com, ABC

So, do you think our future babies will be Eloi or Morlock? Or both?

#HGWellsHadItRight

Slight slide

"Pregnant people" ????

Isn't it usually women who are?

Or are they differentiating from pregnant animals?

“How can a ‘vaccine’ administered 3 months have more deaths than polio or other vaccines available for 10 or more years?”

Duh.
Because it’s given to the oldest and frailest, while polio vaccines are given to the youngest and strongest.
LOL! No one is too stupid to see that.

Any way, since you have some sway with the stupidest and avowedly silliest anti-vaxxers (maybe not with rational anti-vaxxers though).
Glad you’re here. Have your say.
I believe on the immunopathological thread you were bizarrely claiming there’s been only stage 1 studies. Maybe you’d like to continue your thoughts?

Yet, yesterday I took a screen shot of the the following information from the CDC website in which they defer to the judgement of pregnant women whether to be vaccinated or not, without ever mentioning ADE therefore denying them access to informed consent.
``````````
I’m sure it’s just a small oversight by our betters at the CDC.