This explanation of "Free to read & Use" was posted on another website hosting this document, however that website's link was not working so I pulled the text from Wiley.
This image was taken from the website linked below:
Posted on 03/29/2021 12:01:38 PM PDT by ransomnote
This explanation of "Free to read & Use" was posted on another website hosting this document, however that website's link was not working so I pulled the text from Wiley.
This image was taken from the website linked below:
Published literature was reviewed to identify preclinical and clinical evidence that COVID‐19 vaccines could worsen disease upon exposure to challenge or circulating virus. Clinical trial protocols for COVID‐19 vaccines were reviewed to determine if risks were properly disclosed.
COVID‐19 vaccines designed to elicit neutralising antibodies may sensitise vaccine recipients to more severe disease than if they were not vaccinated. Vaccines for SARS, MERS and RSV have never been approved, and the data generated in the development and testing of these vaccines suggest a serious mechanistic concern: that vaccines designed empirically using the traditional approach (consisting of the unmodified or minimally modified coronavirus viral spike to elicit neutralising antibodies), be they composed of protein, viral vector, DNA or RNA and irrespective of delivery method, may worsen COVID‐19 disease via antibody‐dependent enhancement (ADE). This risk is sufficiently obscured in clinical trial protocols and consent forms for ongoing COVID‐19 vaccine trials that adequate patient comprehension of this risk is unlikely to occur, obviating truly informed consent by subjects in these trials.
The specific and significant COVID‐19 risk of ADE should have been and should be prominently and independently disclosed to research subjects currently in vaccine trials, as well as those being recruited for the trials and future patients after vaccine approval, in order to meet the medical ethics standard of patient comprehension for informed consent.
FROM YOUR POSTED “STUDY”:
“...Current data on COVID‐19 vaccines is limited, but does not so far reveal evidence of ADE of disease. Non‐human primate studies of Moderna’s mRNA‐1273 vaccine showed excellent protection, with no detectable immunopathology. Phase 1 trials of several vaccines have not reported any immunopathology in subjects administered the candidate vaccines....”
Soooo how is it that there is somehow this threshold of data by which a clinician is required/obligated to do anything???
And who, exactly, establishes that threshold? Amazing.
Haha. You put 'study' in quotation marks, then cite a quote from it.
Make up your mind, Harkonnen.
This is also from the paper.
COVID‐19 vaccines designed to elicit neutralising antibodies may sensitize vaccine recipients to more severe disease than if they were not vaccinated.
Ransomnote has been telling you vaxxers this for days, now. Try to let it seep into your brain some kinda way.
Vaxxer cult gonna vaxxer cult.
To all you effin libtards seeking certainty with goo in your bodies:
“I will not take any vaccine made possible President Donald J. Trump under his “Operation Warp Speed” or any “Emergency Use Authorization” etc.
Oh, and stop with your tired trope “Pfizer didn’t take any money. They developed it themselves”
Sure they did, idiots.
What they really did was start investigations, begin processes for production, etc to put themselves in a position to be a part of government procurement.
Yeah, that’s right. They contracted for 195,000,000 doses with the government.
They made it easy for the US Government to say yes and Pfizer did this for a profit.
They ain’t no charity as their stockholders would say...
Excerpted:
"Basic research conducted by Graham and others at the National Institutes of Health, Defense Department and federally funded academic laboratories has been the essential ingredient in the rapid development of vaccines in response to COVID-19. The government has poured an additional $10.5 billion into vaccine companies since the pandemic began to accelerate the delivery of their products."
“Soooo how is it that there is somehow this threshold of data by which a clinician is required/obligated to do anything???
And who, exactly, establishes that threshold? Amazing.”
***********************************************************
I don’t know the answer to that but AFTER 93 MILLION AMERICANS RECEIVED COVID-19 VACCINES.... there have been NO REPORTED CASE OF ADE.
https://www.medpagetoday.com/special-reports/exclusives/91648
The specter of ADE is simply another scary boogeyman that the anti-vaxxers hysterically throw against the wall to frighten the gullible.
Doesn't sound so "Scary! Scary!".
Sounds like an accurate description of the risk.
I assume this possible ADE risk of being made more sick by a variant is the reason there are calls to continue ineffective masking and other, possibly very slightly helpful, protocols after vaccination.
I consider it damning of our health establishment that vaccines for this disease were approved before any treatments were.
That’s backwards!
THere is a Mt Everest sized pile of evidence, here’s more, let me know if you want me to stop pinging you!
Thanks for posting
You’re too late.
mRNA is not new. Animals held up well to the vaccination, until they were challenged with the natural virus. The outcome? Organ failure.
We are setting up many, many possible ticking time bombs.
With a survival rate of 99%+ survival rate, I suggest getting your immunity the old fashion way.
Lastly, every single one of us should be asking “why the crazy push for the use of this vaccine?”
But the lemmings insist that it’s safe, and they did their ‘research’, and they also trust the ‘authoritative sources’ who say it’s fine to take and it’s about protecting the community.
The evidence is that the vaccines are safe and very effective.
But that’s beside my point.
Treatments should have been explored and tested from the earliest cases.
Instead patients who tested positive were just sent home and told to come back if it got bad. There was no attempt to try any treatments- no matter how speculative- on them.
That’s not good healthcare.
I have repeatedly said that mRna Vaccines may be one of the greatest breakthroughs in the recent history of Medical Science.
The problem is that we don’t know yet.
I am selflessly volunteering to be in the ‘control group’
a random article about covid
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.