This explanation of "Free to read & Use" was posted on another website hosting this document, however that website's link was not working so I pulled the text from Wiley.
This image was taken from the website linked below:
This explanation of "Free to read & Use" was posted on another website hosting this document, however that website's link was not working so I pulled the text from Wiley.
This image was taken from the website linked below:
Published literature was reviewed to identify preclinical and clinical evidence that COVID‐19 vaccines could worsen disease upon exposure to challenge or circulating virus. Clinical trial protocols for COVID‐19 vaccines were reviewed to determine if risks were properly disclosed.
COVID‐19 vaccines designed to elicit neutralising antibodies may sensitise vaccine recipients to more severe disease than if they were not vaccinated. Vaccines for SARS, MERS and RSV have never been approved, and the data generated in the development and testing of these vaccines suggest a serious mechanistic concern: that vaccines designed empirically using the traditional approach (consisting of the unmodified or minimally modified coronavirus viral spike to elicit neutralising antibodies), be they composed of protein, viral vector, DNA or RNA and irrespective of delivery method, may worsen COVID‐19 disease via antibody‐dependent enhancement (ADE). This risk is sufficiently obscured in clinical trial protocols and consent forms for ongoing COVID‐19 vaccine trials that adequate patient comprehension of this risk is unlikely to occur, obviating truly informed consent by subjects in these trials.
The specific and significant COVID‐19 risk of ADE should have been and should be prominently and independently disclosed to research subjects currently in vaccine trials, as well as those being recruited for the trials and future patients after vaccine approval, in order to meet the medical ethics standard of patient comprehension for informed consent.
FROM YOUR POSTED “STUDY”:
“...Current data on COVID‐19 vaccines is limited, but does not so far reveal evidence of ADE of disease. Non‐human primate studies of Moderna’s mRNA‐1273 vaccine showed excellent protection, with no detectable immunopathology. Phase 1 trials of several vaccines have not reported any immunopathology in subjects administered the candidate vaccines....”
To all you effin libtards seeking certainty with goo in your bodies:
“I will not take any vaccine made possible President Donald J. Trump under his “Operation Warp Speed” or any “Emergency Use Authorization” etc.
Oh, and stop with your tired trope “Pfizer didn’t take any money. They developed it themselves”
Sure they did, idiots.
What they really did was start investigations, begin processes for production, etc to put themselves in a position to be a part of government procurement.
Yeah, that’s right. They contracted for 195,000,000 doses with the government.
They made it easy for the US Government to say yes and Pfizer did this for a profit.
They ain’t no charity as their stockholders would say...
Doesn't sound so "Scary! Scary!".
Sounds like an accurate description of the risk.
I assume this possible ADE risk of being made more sick by a variant is the reason there are calls to continue ineffective masking and other, possibly very slightly helpful, protocols after vaccination.
THere is a Mt Everest sized pile of evidence, here’s more, let me know if you want me to stop pinging you!
Thanks for posting
mRNA is not new. Animals held up well to the vaccination, until they were challenged with the natural virus. The outcome? Organ failure.
We are setting up many, many possible ticking time bombs.
With a survival rate of 99%+ survival rate, I suggest getting your immunity the old fashion way.
Lastly, every single one of us should be asking “why the crazy push for the use of this vaccine?”