With the stern now free, would bow and stern thrusters have more effect? (If this ship has them)
well this is encouraging news
so far the ship hasnt split
Why is the ship called the Ever Given when the word “Evergreen” is painted in white letters on both sides?
Now can we direct the focus back on Cuomo?
Same Ship Different Day
I’m watching Agenda Free TV on youtube.
The stern is free, but the bow is not.
Sounds like its not even close...did they just bend the ship? The bow is stuck fast, supposedly.
30° 0' 56" N
32° 34' 46" E (It took a LOT of searching!)
Granted, these waters in the Suez Canal are tighter and shallower (but navigation through the canal is far more highly ritualized and overseen) and the Ever Given is far bigger, but the grounding of the USS Missouri was epic in aspects of dysfunction, embarrassment, and the fastness of the grounding.
The grounding of the Ever Given can be attributed to perhaps inattention coupled with an untimely gust of wind, but the grounding of the Missouri is juicy with...hubris.
On the morning of January 17, 1950, the USS Missouri left Norfolk for only the second time under her new captain, CAPT William Brown, and on her way out, was to conduct an exercise where she would steam past some experimental acoustic devices that would record her screws which they were trying to use to identify ships.
Captain Brown ordered the speed increased to 15 knots, which for this area of water was considered quite fast for a ship of that size, and when one of the officers made his opinion known, the Captain ignored him and overrode him.
Down in the chart room, the officers in charge of navigation were puzzled both by the speed and the trajectory of the ship which was (to them) taking them into shoal water. One of the navigation officers looked out the port hole and saw a navigation buoy and knew they were going on the wrong side of the buoy, basically cutting the corner ACROSS the shoals.
Multiple people with more experience in the area realized what was going on and tried to tell Captain Brown, who repeatedly ignored them or that they had no idea where they were.
When the ship hit the mud in the shoals, the angle of the bottom was so shallow, and the mud so slick that nobody even felt the ship going aground. Something amiss was noted when men on the stern saw muddy water being churned up by the screws, and almost simultaneously, the salt water intakes for cooling water for the engines clogged and temperatures began to rise. It all happened so softly and gradually that the ship had gone aground 2500 feet before finally stopping that most of the crew did not even realize they had run aground!
It was that slick mud that served as a "lubricant", and raised the entire ship several feet out of the water, after which it began to settle back, and the sticky mud encased the entire hull, grasping it tightly.
Worse (if possible) she had run aground at an unusually high tide, which as anyone knows, is very bad. To make things even worse, she was fully loaded with both fuel and ammunition which brought her displacement up to 57,000 tons.
She wasn't aground, she was...ashore, by more than two ship lengths worth! Just as bad from a publicity perspective, she was aground in full view of a major heavily travelled roadway. There she would stay for two weeks.
They brought Admiral Homer Wallin in who had been instrumental in the salvage efforts at Pearl Harbor, and his straightforward plan involved the obvious steps:
But after offloading all her fuel, ammunition, food, water, anchors, and even her anchor chains, they were unsuccessful.
They added even more pontoons, and had divers all along both sides of the hull with pressure water hoses trying to dislodge mud adhering to the hull like cement, as tugboats above on port and starboard sides alternately applied pressure to rock the hull from side to side, as tugs fore and aft pushed and pulled at the same time.
I cannot imagine how dangerous that must have been for those divers.
Politically, it became intolerable for the Navy.
An Army helicopter darted in (under full view of the Press and civilians on the side of the highway, watching) and lowered a line with a sign saying something like "Need a hook?" and even the Soviet Union piled on from afar.
Heads rolled. As they should have.
If BBC can’t get Evergreen’s name right, how can we believe anything below the headline?
What is with the lack of any discussion of the “erratic” pattern of movement prior to the “accident”? Who is the captain? I can only assume these unreported items are due to the fact the captain isn’t a drunk white guy. This incident was a big FU to someone. Not an accident.