Posted on 03/28/2021 3:22:05 PM PDT by RandFan
@ChadPergram
Biden on gun legislation:
I'm the one has ever gotten (it) passed, man. Everybody keeps wondering whether I'm serious about dealing with rational gun control. The only gun control legislation ever passed is mine and it's going to happen again.
(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...
Pathetic anti-American POS.
FMCDH and only after I’ve expended every round of high velocity lead first. FUJB.
So, the NFA act of 1934 was his. And so was the 1968 GCA.
Man, he's been at this forever.
Beat me to it!
Delusional man. The 1968 Gun Control law was written by Thomas J. Dodd from a Nazi weapons law in Germany.
http://jpfo.org/filegen-a-m/GCA_68.htm
It was T. J. Dodd and Emanual Cellar who proposed the first handgun registration in 1062. “Long guns will not be affected!” they said. Now all guns are affected.
ASSHOLE STOLE THE ELECTION. NOT MY PRESIDENT. NOT PRESIDENT.
Not to mention his wife props him up as well.
“Man, he’s been at this forever.”
And yet, no good has come from him. Imagine that.
“Biden on gun legislation: “The only gun control legislation ever passed is mine and it’s going to happen again”
And will be just as successful as it was the last time, eh Birdbrain?
Can’t be the GFSZA, that was Sent Kohl.
Unfortunately the communists will soon produce "irrational" gun control...
In their plans are:
Because of these things, the outraged American sheeple will fall on their collective knees and beg for more free money checks...
He just killed the Manchin-Toomey bill.
Kiss my ass, fake President!
Your English is deplorable, but your logic is spot-on. LoL
Franklin Roosevelt: The Father of Gun Control
But consider the following analysis of a major constitutional problem with federal peacetime gun control laws.
From related threads…
To start this 2nd Amendment (2A) discussion, please consider this. Regarding recent gun violence, the main option that the delegates to the Constitutional Convention gave to the feds to address domestic violence in a state is to wait for that state to formally request help from the feds.
"Article IV, Section 4: The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence [emphasis added]."
As a side note to federal involvement in violence, note that although a state is not obligated to request help from the feds for domestic violence, consider that the feds do have the express power to intervene in a state on the basis of nationally-related violence.
"Article I, Section 8, Clause 15: To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions [emphasis added];"
Otherwise, let’s examine major constitutional problems (imo) with so-called federal peacetime gun control laws and executive orders that Biden’s teleprompter seems to have overlooked.
Patriots, in addition to continuing to defend 2A, also argue that the states have never expressly constitutionally given the feds the specific power to make peacetime gun control laws.
More specifically, since the federal government has only those powers that the states expressly constitutionally give to it, some of the drafters of the Bill of Rights (BoR) had expressed the following concern.
The drafters had feared that patriots would eventually develop tunnel vision (my words) for BoR protections and forget that the BoR was redundant in the context that powers that the states have never expressly constitutionally given the feds to regulate our basic protections are prohibited to the feds.
”From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added].” —United States v. Butler, 1936.
In fact, the congressional record shows that Rep. John Bingham, a constitutional lawmaker, had clarified that, until the 14th Amendment (14A) was ratified was ratified, the states hadn’t expressly constitutionally given the feds the specific power to make peacetime penal laws, not even for murder.
"Our Constitution never conferred upon the Congress of the United States the power - sacred as life is, first as it is before all other rights which pertain to man on this side of the grave - to protect it in time of peace by the terrors of the penal code within organized states; and Congress has never attempted to do it. There never was a law upon the United States statute-book to punish the murderer for taking away in time of peace the life of the noblest, and the most unoffending, as well, of your citizens, within the limits of any State of the Union. The protection of the citizen in that respect was left to the respective States, and there the power is to-day [emphases added].” —Rep. John Bingham, Congressional Globe. (See bottom half of third column.)
The great irony of 14A where today’s unconstitutional (imo) peacetime federal gun control laws are concerned is this. That amendment gives Congress the specific power only to make penal laws that STRENGTHEN constitutionally enumerated rights, including 2A, from abridgment by state actors, still no express power for Congress to make peacetime gun control laws.
“The right of suffrage was not necessarily one of the privileges or immunities of citizenship before the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment, and that amendment does not add to these privileges and immunities. It simply furnishes additional guaranty for the protection of such as the citizen already had [emphasis added].” —Minor v. Happersett, 1874.
Unfortunately, today’s generation is proof that patriots have long-forgotten the significance of constitutionally enumerated federal government powers as the drafters of the BoR had feared, particularly the lack of such powers in the context of peacetime gun rights.
Getting back to FDR, it is disturbing that peacetime restrictive federal gun laws seem to have started appearing in the books during FDR Administration, FDR and the Congress at that time infamous for making laws which they have no express constitutional power to make imo.
Even the post-FDR era, institutionally indoctrinated Supreme Court is glaring evidence that top legal professionals don’t bother to check if a contested federal law is reasonably justified under a constitutionally enumerated power.
Finally, citizens need to start working with their federal lawmakers to demand the following. When the federal government accuses someone of violating a law, the accused also needs to be informed of at least the common name of the constitutional clause that arguably justifies the law for further scrutiny of the constitutionality of that law, especially where our 2A safety net is concerned.
Read my tag line....
Says it all.
They are all hypocrites. I consider background checks and such as infringements. It makes a database of gun owners that the government can use to confiscate when they decide to do so.
Hunter, like his father is a drug addict and a completely and utterly foolish man.
“I think it’s the 1994 assault weapons ban that makes him hard.”
You mean the one that died a “sunset” death when it was proven not to make any difference?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.