You are thinking of lots of stuff that has value but are peripheral and secondary to the kernel, you just didnt follow the scientific paper and document trail that is actually a train of cars connected on the same track, and this is what you need to do first. I myself, got all these train cars from others, then I put them on the track to show its part of one train and made some simple calls and sent some simple emails to get info from the places themselves.
They say they have used metagenomics to sequence (by a co called Illumina) the sample of sludge (lung wash) they say they got from patient one in Wuhan. Nature paper:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2008-3
This paper at top says it was submitted on Jan 7th 2020 and was accepted on Jan 20th 2020-only 9 business days later.
A later paper in March in Cell (published just to repeat the story of the first paper),
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32220310/
says:âÂÂFortunately, next-generation metatranscriptomic sequencing enabled us to obtain a complete viral genome from this patient on January 5, 2020âÂÂ.
Looking at the dates, they wrote up the Nature paper and submitted it and a gene accession no to a gene bank within 2 days. I personally suspect this paper is just written up and not real because this long paper must have been written in advance, and it is the first train car in train that all the others must follow because they made the gene sequence as the base.
The entire PCR and then the Vax genome was determined from this ONE CASE based on the same gene accession no. The FDA said there were no isolates available in its PCR spec paper, the Chinese NIH Head said on video âÂÂwe did not isolate the virusâÂÂ, and Pfizer replied to FOIA requests the genome it uses as base for the Vax did not come from an isolate from an infected person? I omit the links here as they are easy to look up yourself.
To determine the exact pathogen, and where any lab would be able to INDEPENDENTLY reproduce isolation and confirm the pathogen claims and vax makers contents are appropriate, we need an isolate where the whole genome can be sequenced and the isolates can be shown to be from patients with similar pathology, and that these PURIFIED isolates can cause the same histologic changes in tissue cultures (preferably in humans or an animal similar to a human as study in humans is an ethical problem-not to mention that vaccinating the entire world with an experimental vaccine is a much bigger ethical problem), but there are no purified isolates....
Metagenomic problems:
1. Metagenomic sequencing of a mixed sample uses primers and then fills in the rest of the genome âÂÂin-silicoâ meaning in a computer program (i.e. on paper) based on a gene library (this is the part that can be fudged). Now you can get any sequence you like and set your PCR test based on the genes in that which may actually cross-react with other things (see links in my posts above).
2. Because of this, Metagenomic sequencing is only supposed to be done on organisms that have already been well characterized. How can a novel Corona be well characterized? Scroll to the image on the left about 1/3 way down from this top link:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/metagenomics
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41564-019-0637-9
So now you can have labs reproduce cell cultures and define the pathogen based on a metagenome, and/or a PCR based on the metagenome now matched to the gene library you have yourself made up. If there were purified isolates on the market or reproduced independently then the whole story would crumble because the fudged part leads to faulty PCRs and vaxes that can have mRNA or DNA that leads to certain effects that would not be in a virus but could be in a genome you make in silico. Nobody makes isolates because there is no virus to make an isolate from, its just a positive PCR test or metagenome primers looking at a bunch of gook or cell-cultures you can buy that will lead you to the same place in the gene bank that you made up to begin with, and now you can make variants in-silico, and on and on.
BEI Resources makes and sells a few dozen covid âÂÂisolatesâÂÂ. I asked them if they isolated and purified the viruses, they replied the isolates are only cell culture lysates. Bacteria and fungi are usually killed off. Mix of viruses are left. If you use PCR on these you will of course find Covid because thatâÂÂs the only place on the map the pcr leads.
Maybe they have other corona’s in them for the E-M photos and to detect primers that lead to the gene bank for sars cov 2, this part is my conjecture.
Reply from BEI Resources, biggest US maker of so called isolates:
âÂÂâÂÂâÂÂâÂÂâÂÂâÂÂâÂÂ
None of these products are really purified. Each of the virus strains are provided as cell lysate and supernatant. They definitely will not have been separated into density gradients and this is not something we would have tested for during the course of the normal QC and Authentication testing for these items.
Walter Usener
BEI Resources
Customer/Technical Services
Administered by ATCC
10801 University Blvd
Manassas Virginia, 20110-2209
Email: Contact@BEIResources.org
Phone: 800-359-7370
âÂÂâÂÂâÂÂâÂÂâÂÂâÂÂâÂÂâÂÂâÂÂ
They also told me they have no info on anyone who ever isolated and purified the virus from these cell cultures that only have inactivated viruses they say. Now you know that the word ISOLATE can be corrupted to any meaning you want.
Metagenomics is the bionic man of genetics, Part biology (but can still be faked), mostly made from silicon.
In reviewing the mRNA research, I got the impression that they reached a certain point of development with a lot of momentum, purportedly excited about the potential of T-cell immunity etc., and then paused to wait for Hillary to take office to unroll the fake planned-demic.
I beieve all these materials and 'discoveries' have been on ice since 2017.
I see that you note the initial nature article was accepted on 1/20/2020 (Biden's inauguration)- I believe it was supposed to be accepted 1/20/2016 (Hillary's inauguration).
I could see that they created a self-referential system (e.g., fake PCR can 'say anything' and research could say 'anything' and lockdowns could be based on 'anything', vaccines etc.) but I've wondered about the coordination.
I wondered who/how it was coordinated so that live samples would never be used. I could see that the US CDC/NIH was working with China, 'waiting' for the genome from them, agreeing not to isolate it in the US.
But then I've seen supposed research detailing the nature of the 'virus' and wonder where 'it' is. Do you think there is an 'it' to isolate? I see research like this and think someone is looking at something isolated, if you can actually find chimeric DNA.
Could mRNA Vaccines Permanently Alter DNA? Recent Science Suggests They Might.
The Defender ^ | 4/8/21 | Children’s Health team
Posted on 4/8/2021, 3:37:15 PMdelta7
So that could be real research or China could have awarded these guys a press packet and prestige.
I wrote something that basically makes the case that an invalid PCR means invalid drug trials and suggested the trials and 'results' are faked. (The logical argument that Fauci, Moderna, Pfizer and others may have fabricated fake Covid-19 vaccine trials and reported falsified data (freerepublic.com))
All the talk of Covid-19 prions and mRNA prions makes me wonder if they want to push a 'prion' (mad cow) 'vaccine'. We're they're petri dish and they aren't done yet. But if there is no 'it' then the prions are part of the fear psyop.
Would be interested to know if there's something actually at the bottom of the stack of dirty laundry or it's all just dirty laundry the CDC, NIH, China are pushing around.
Again, thank you for the information (both of your posts). Much to consider and a clear picture is likely beyond my capacity to understand.
Links to journal articles are definitely appreciated.