Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Royal Family is Finally Providing Bang for the Buck
Townhall.com ^ | March 10, 2021 | /rachel Marsden

Posted on 03/10/2021 8:18:44 AM PST by Kaslin

PARIS -- We pardon the interruption of your regularly scheduled programming of global conflict, economic woes and morbid daily pandemic tallies to bring you the sordid tale of a married couple complaining to a billionaire about their family, from which they have recently emancipated themselves and now accuse of racist undertones, backstabbing, badmouthing and almost driving one of them to suicide.

Does that sound like a matter on which the White House and the prime minister of the United Kingdom should be commenting? Because they were asked to. Does it sound like something that 17 million Americans and millions more abroad would take time out of their own busy lives to witness? Because that indeed happened. All due to the fact that the family in question isn't some unknown entity on a reality TV show but rather the British monarchy. And the couple in question is Meghan Markle and Prince Harry. Their confidante? American talk-show mogul Oprah Winfrey. Crass and unbecoming of royals? Perhaps. But then what isn't these days?

I'm from Canada, part of the British Commonwealth. It's estimated that the royal family costs each of us in the Commonwealth $1.58 in U.S. dollars per year. The question for those paying taxes to the monarchy has always been whether we're getting our money's worth. Now that certain family members are putting on a show that costs far less than a monthly Netflix subscription, perhaps the answer is finally yes.

The big question seems to be whether Meghan and Harry will somehow reform the monarchy. Into what, exactly? From a rather boring reality show into a hit reality show? Mission accomplished. The Oprah interview is now widely considered to be the biggest royal interview since Princess Diana of Wales aired dirty laundry about her marriage to Prince Charles in a BBC interview a quarter-century ago, which is perhaps the last time anyone paid serious attention to the royals aside from the occasional wedding.

No doubt the monarchy takes itself seriously and has many people within "the firm" working hard on its branding. But the reality is that we're a long way from the initial function and purpose of the British royals. Elizabeth I, for example, has a biography that reads like that of a military commander. But her reign was back in the 16th century, when the world was much different and monarchy was synonymous with government. While the queen is still technically the head of state of Britain and Canada, the prime ministers of those nations carry out the daily functions of running the country, while the monarchy has become a vestige.

In much the same way that the human appendix is considered an evolutionary remnant that played a digestive role back when humans were more herbivorous, the royal family no longer has a practical function. It exists to serve as a living reminder of the British Empire. It has a public relations function similar to that of foreign diplomats. But it has lost the power to shape actual policy, since such a role for a monarch would be incompatible with the modern democracy that Britain has become.

There's nothing wrong with the monarchy serving as a living window into Britain's past -- a reminder of the nation's roots. But the problem with being statues in a living museum is that it's hard to know what to do with yourself when you wake up in the morning. Mostly, the royals try to spend their time serving charitable causes and bringing attention to various social issues. But now they're competing for relevance in a noisy sea of "influencers" with jacked-up bums and chests, plastic after-market modifications, and a willingness to say anything to capture an audience whose attention spans increasingly approach those of fruit flies due to the rewiring of their brains by the instant-gratification programming of social media.

Now that Meghan and Harry have moved to Hollywood and picked a public fight with their family from across the Atlantic, they have already changed the royal family in a sense. With just one interview, they've made the royal family drama the hottest reality show in the world. People can't seem to get enough, judging by the ratings. It may be incompatible with how the institution views itself, but it's entirely aligned with what people seem to want in the current times. By playing things too straight, the monarchy would be making the same kind of miscalculation that Tom Cruise made by fancying himself a dramatic actor rather than a seriously talented comedic one.

In much the same way that the military-industrial complex is the ultimate winner when it sells weapons to both sides in a war, the British monarchy as an institution is the ultimate winner in this family skirmish. It's back on the radar as an entity that's relatable to a world captivated by publicly aired personal drama and nonstop oversharing.

The royals are finally showing the plebeians how it's really done. Own it. Embrace it. Unless, of course, you have something more compelling to offer the thirsty masses paying for the privilege.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: distractions; royalfamily
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 03/10/2021 8:18:44 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Ah, when SNL invented the comedy term “Ignorant Sl*t” little did they know that a not small number of leftist (Democrats obviously) women would proudly wear the title.

You readin’ Nancy, Meghan, Occasional Cortex?


2 posted on 03/10/2021 8:26:15 AM PST by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Elizabeth II will be the last Queen.


3 posted on 03/10/2021 8:28:31 AM PST by Meatspace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Having wed a Canadian, I’m subjected to Royal gossip. We discussed The Interview at length this morning, and concluded there was no point to it save for the business & profits of celebrity gossip (including for the subject of talk). This couple has nothing to offer the world warranting millions watching. Diana at least was a fairytale princess promoting meaningful charity work. Meghan is a cougar; Harry is a cuck.

Only part of The Interview I saw was the chicken coop bit, which seemed a massive non-sequitur: a billionaire and a couple millionaires picking up a few eggs as though impoverished.


4 posted on 03/10/2021 8:31:34 AM PST by ctdonath2 (Interesting how those so interested in workERS are so disinterested in workING.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Megan intends to be an International Celebrity and Harry's fully on Board..... Their Tudors are Barrack and Michelle Obama. All four are Globalists intending to bring America and Britain under the New world Order.
5 posted on 03/10/2021 8:38:13 AM PST by caww ("Politics is not a game, but a serious business" - Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Bread and Circuses.


6 posted on 03/10/2021 8:39:30 AM PST by CoastWatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Starting to look a little like the daily body count from back in the VN days. How long before someone makes that comparison? Or have they already? We’ve lost more people in a year than we lost in Viet Nam. So, consider getting a CV19 shot as your flak jacket.


7 posted on 03/10/2021 8:40:27 AM PST by rktman (Destroy America from within? Check! WTH? Enlisted USN 1967 to end up with this?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Sorry, should have included the appropriate reference: “...morbid daily pandemic tallies...”


8 posted on 03/10/2021 8:41:49 AM PST by rktman (Destroy America from within? Check! WTH? Enlisted USN 1967 to end up with this?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The last British monarch to lead troops in war was George II (after whom the colony of Georgia was named).

I once was looking at microfilm of an American newspaper from the early 1820s. A lot of "news" about gossip about the British royal family (the king was George IV, who treated his wife badly).

9 posted on 03/10/2021 8:42:14 AM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2

a couple millionaires picking up a few eggs as though impoverished.

Indeed however far to many of the public are lemmings the show was a rerun of the election all show and no glow.


10 posted on 03/10/2021 8:42:24 AM PST by Vaduz (women and children to be impacIQ of chimpsted the most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2
But But But, they are Royals!, "Bluebloods", the world simply MUST hear from them!
11 posted on 03/10/2021 8:43:50 AM PST by Thumper1960 (Trump-2020)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2
......”This couple has nothing to offer the world warranting millions watching”.....

Obviously the Press who promoted this interview weeks before it aired wanted a worldwide scandal they could all get paid for..... 64 nations paid to air the story.....Oprah had a comeback...and of course Megan got her moment of vengeance for the Royals refusing to give her what she wanted.

Harry's like a fish out of water...."I was trapped but I didn't know I was trapped".....(unfortunately he is but not to the Royal Family) He's not real bright.

Will say again...these two are worse than Hollywoods Bottom feeders!

12 posted on 03/10/2021 8:47:07 AM PST by caww ("Politics is not a game, but a serious business" - Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus

Hey, now.....’Lizbeth served in the motor pool during the second Great War to end all wars. That makes her a veteran, wot?


13 posted on 03/10/2021 8:47:33 AM PST by Thumper1960 (Trump-2020)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: caww

You know it.


14 posted on 03/10/2021 8:47:44 AM PST by kelly4c
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2

These two are toxic.....


15 posted on 03/10/2021 8:48:58 AM PST by caww ("Politics is not a game, but a serious business" - Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: caww

Since they left their Royal duties & moved to the USA, I think the Palace was thinking of going to the ultimate step to removing their Duke & Duchess Titles as they should. If your out, then you are out.

But this interview pre-empted that, because now it is racism and retaliation if they do.

Similar to Colin Kappernick, the way to avoid getting cut from the team was to kneel for the anthem and make it a race issue, not your performance, if you get cut.


16 posted on 03/10/2021 8:50:31 AM PST by Jimmy The Snake (He )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jimmy The Snake

Yes....Harry even said they cut him off financially just this Month..they new it was coming...and the titles too would eventually be a done deal. My gosh the Man is almost 40 yrs. old....with Millions....get a job.

Their problem is they want people paying attention to them who aren’t.


17 posted on 03/10/2021 8:55:43 AM PST by caww ("Politics is not a game, but a serious business" - Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Here's some interesting, and hopefully good, news...

Piers Morgan for GB News! Andrew Neil wants to sign him up after GMB exit 'Huge asset!' PIERS MORGAN has been backed by incoming GB News chief Andrew Neil after the former Good Morning Britain host dramatically quit the show on Tuesday.

18 posted on 03/10/2021 9:07:16 AM PST by mewzilla (Break out the mustard seeds. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Most people miss the point of this.

She is going to run for office. Or at least she wants to.

The problem here is that she tells lies to spin her story and doesn’t make sure they will hold up

Like the “I just want to seem authentic so I will lie about my simple wedding” ploy

That blew up in her face.

So time will tell if she can hold the line or damage herself beyond repair


19 posted on 03/10/2021 9:07:59 AM PST by RummyChick (To President Trump: https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3923111/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
I think as ridiculous as the interview was on all counts, the long-term consequence will be the eventual collapse of the monarchy.

The British Empire. Long gone.

The monarchy, extinction coming our way at some point, sooner now rather than later.

The British tabloids will pick up on it and never let go, until the monarchy is indeed gone.

20 posted on 03/10/2021 9:28:44 AM PST by detch (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson