Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: dangus
Oooooh! You found one phrase to dismiss the entire argument. Is that the sum of your analytical skill?

Actually, no. I stopped reading your "good description" after I read its first sentence.

Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus, you know. Or maybe you don't.

ML/NJ

106 posted on 03/05/2021 5:49:09 AM PST by ml/nj (DITCH MITCH !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]


To: ml/nj

When you say that you read Dred Scott, did you quit reading at the first sentence? The author was calling Taney INCONSISTENT and therefore indefensible no matter WHAT your legal philosophy. Rigid in one place, yet “tortured meanings out of other, more-obscure clauses.”


107 posted on 03/05/2021 5:51:47 AM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson