Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Melian
Thanx for that. There is a link to the study in the article. Grains of salt needed.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-83040-3#:~:text=In%20total,%2020,507,518%20years%20of,per%20death%20is%2016%20years

The study is ongoing:

"Attempts to estimate total excess mortality related to the COVID-19 are underway, and emphasized as an important measure"

This article does say "As such, we focus on premature mortality here."

They do not take into consideration co-morbidity and they also don't say this study is of those that died of COVID only

"Second, those dying from COVID-19 may be an at-risk population whose remaining life expectancy is shorter than the average person’s remaining life expectancy16,17,18. This methodological concern is likely to be valid, and consequently our estimate of the total YLL due to COVID-19 may be an overestimate. "

Hello, McFly...
827 posted on 02/22/2021 1:12:06 PM PST by stylin19a (Seems 4,153,237 people got wed one year, not to start trouble but shouldn't that be an even number?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 713 | View Replies ]


To: stylin19a

“They do not take into consideration co-morbidity and they also don’t say this study is of those that died of COVID only.”

Actually, no pun intended, it would be interesting to see a study on life years lost to COVID conducted by actuaries.


894 posted on 02/22/2021 3:38:19 PM PST by CheshireTheCat ("Forgetting pain is convenient.Remembering it agonizing.But recovering truth is worth the suffering")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 827 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson