1. He said Trump is a pawn
2. He used the phrase: "he wants to stay in power"
(That phrase right there is big the giveaway.)
3. He says the military instituted an "interim" government but at the same time says the IA would have caused a civil war. (horse manure)
4. No outside comms
Conclusion: I will keep it simple. Mostly speculative rubbish.
Thanks. I basically think the same thing but wanted to break it down as to how and why it is rubbish, been trying to do that a bit.
AND the post set is “salted” with the N-word. I find, even in the “bleeding edge” of the Anon space, that phraseology like that is FAR more likely than not to be seeding keywords. That was pretty much the primary misgiving for me. I just can’t accept that people that are speaking from an insider or position-of-authority stance litter their “cogency” with racially polarizing or insulting phraseology under the rubric of being as cool as the rest of the crew.
You know the minute anything whatsoever leads the presstitutes to that thread they’re going to get the vapors over how much they get to print their clichegasms...
Exce4llent analysis.