::...someone with Juan’s extensive intel background and current Q associations.::
~~~~~~~~~~~~
Q said no outside comms.
That's true even though Juan has indicated that he has played a role in the current war.
I doubt that applies to Charlie Ward.
Most in these parts are on the same team and we use what we know to get more people to join our numbers and help keep stragglers from losing heart. I think most do that without flapping lips that would go outside the plan, detract from victory or--God forbid--"sink ships."
If you tell your troops no outside comms in a battle environment, then your agreed method of comms is broken or destroyed or compromised, so you send a physical runner to warn another team of impeding danger, but the other team says "Wait, there's no outside comms" and shoots the runner, and then gets destroyed because they killed the runner trying to warn them... Then they are stupid. Very legalistic minded and very stupid.
So depending on what people mean by no outside comms, there sure is a presumption of it anyway, unless it is someone the consensus doesn't like and depending on the board. I have seen people completely rely on a post (on ocho kay) by an anon no one ever heard of, but at the same time shoot down someone whom they have known for a long time over something petty and put more favor on a likely clown asset on a board. Utterly ridiculous! Circular firing squads.
I take EVERYthing with a grain of salt, completely trust no one and gather info from whomever the heck I want and there's not a darn thing anyone can do about it. Not everyone has the ability to filter out truth from error, granted, but some of us do. Don't burn my books. Burn your own.
It seems to me you and a couple of others are using this "no outside comms" phrase as a hammer to imply that Juan O'Savin (JOS) is a black hat and therefore you've nailed him as someone to whom patriots should not listen. To me, that sounds suspiciously like a mechanism black hats use to shut down free speech and damage patriots' efforts to win back their captured government.
See at the PDJT impeachment trial how our adversaries are attacking his presumed-as-sinister comms! Delegate Stacey Plaskett (D-VI) brought up the debunked claim that PDJT used his appearance at the first presidential debate to communicate with the right-wing Proud Boys. This fantasy is promoted to pass for evidence at a former president's impeachment! We're presumably supposed to add this to the historical narrative of fictions that will need to be defended to avoid being sent to a re-education camp or at our trial as terrorists.
AS PDJT said, "They're actually coming after you; I'm just in their way!"
Imagine if that illusory paradigm were available to be used against any tidbit from LTG Flynn or Adm. Rogers!
I confidently maintain that both 1) the media phenomenon we know as Q has not authorized JOS to communicate on its behalf, and 2) that JOS has not drawn unto himself as if he is communicating on behalf of what we know as Q.
That's not to say JOS should or should not have disclosed facts he's chosen to disclose.
That paradigm has not been the case with Bill Hicks, A.K.A. Alex Jones, who owes his media presence to support from Mossad. AJ has claimed that InfoWars "has its own Q," apparently meaning an insider who has provided secret intel claimed to be on a par with Q's drops. In addition to that short-lived false aggrandizement, I believe AJ has since dropped use of this claim.
I'm confident that if Q were to disclose classified material in an unauthorized fashion that black hats would mercilessly use that to discredit the phenomenon (in its entirety, including all Trump supporters) as they have through other angles, such as calling it a "conspiracy theory," labeling its supporters as "terrorists," and many times getting them fired from their jobs wherever an opportunity seems to arise, even using FBI-gathered information to do so.
Beyond the phenom we know as Q, it is also a U.S. Department of Energy nuclear clearance. People that have a Q clearance should not be understood necessarily to have anything to do with the domestic and/or international Q phenomenon that is in our vernacular the communication outlet of a person or team of persons who are keeping patriots informed of otherwise generally not-known (We The People) government information and habbenings.
JOS, IMHO, is unquestionably a Q supporter and wouldn't consciously damage the cause. Without making any claim whatsoever as to Q's wider adoption of any JOS input, I happen to know JOS has anonymously participated in providing crumbs on that board that we're not supposed to mention or link to. Such crumbs would not appropriately be considered outside comms, but inside, within the veil, wouldn't they?