I thought J&J’s vax started out less effective but got stronger over time and they had no infections occurring in folks who had 49 days under their belts.
Also, how “technically adept” are you with mRNA/Transfection?
Since the current vaccines using it are first-time events for people, there seems to be no actual track record - or am I missing something?
No it does t get stronger it is what it is. Who coined the term transfection? It is a meaningless term meant to cause fear. I understand virology and genetics and understand how the vaccine works
Aint going anywhere near the mRNA.
I've heard numerous times people say that we now have a vaccine. Yet the truth is that neither of the mRNA vaccines have been fully "approved". They are only being used under Emergency Use Authorization.
My understanding is that they have been playing around with mRNA vaccines for years, yet could never get one approved.
I spoke to a friend of mine over Christmas and his wife works in the process of collating and analyzing data from trials at a drug company. She was very emphatic that no way in hell was she getting the mRNA vaccine, and would wait for a more traditional alternative. I didn't ask why or dig, but figure she has a good reason for her opinion.
But regardless of which type of vaccine a person elects, the drug company is insulated from and side effects you may experience. I just it ironic that they have not been able to develop a solid flu or common cold vaccine in decades; but many are lining up to get poked with an experimental vaccine. To each their own.