When called on it by another physician you fail to demonstrate any knowledge or credential to validate your opinion.
That is simply a flat out lie. More vague, non-specific broad brushed noise.
They made several claims. To one I posted CDC statistics. One I rebutted with current clinical studies that made the NIH change their recommendation. Do you too claim that treatment X is effective or not, just because a few of your patients claim to have taken it, with out you knowing the amount, the frequency, the duration, other special factors that might have worked against it's effectiveness? That is what I called out. Junk medical conclusions on effectiveness that would get laughed at.
And yet you still haven’t shared your clinical credentials. You also make several untrue assumptions. The number patients I have treated with both regiments I have a count. The overall efficacy is poor and the subject pool is statistically significant. The reason I know you have no scientific training is because you base your flawed theory on incorrect assumptions that you post as fact.
You repeat talking points that are incorrect. You don’t discern between valid evidence and what you want to be the truth.
It’s ok. You have been asked several times and your avoidance of the answer speaks quite loudly on its face