And yet you still haven’t shared your clinical credentials. You also make several untrue assumptions. The number patients I have treated with both regiments I have a count. The overall efficacy is poor and the subject pool is statistically significant. The reason I know you have no scientific training is because you base your flawed theory on incorrect assumptions that you post as fact.
You repeat talking points that are incorrect. You don’t discern between valid evidence and what you want to be the truth.
It’s ok. You have been asked several times and your avoidance of the answer speaks quite loudly on its face
Evidently your much vaunted credentials are not in reading comprehension. A basic reading lesson for you... When I say "Do you too claim", I am not stating you did claimed anything. So what wrong assumption did I make? Answer: NONE.
You repeat talking points that are incorrect. You don’t discern between valid evidence and what you want to be the truth.
More vague broad brushed garbage with no specifics. We seem to not understand what the word "specific" means. Either that or you can't refute with specifics and so the desperate clinging to vagueness time and time again.